The FCC Public Safety Bureau said in a report Thursday the Oct. 4 test of wireless emergency alerts and the broadcast emergency alert system appeared to be mostly a success, though there’s room for improvement. The report called for further FCC action addressing some of the problems uncovered. At the time of the tests, a Federal Emergency Management Agency official described (see 2310040071) them as “extremely successful." Based on survey data shared with the commission, “most respondents reported successful receipt of the WEA test message,” the report said: “The test also highlighted areas where WEA delivery can be improved, such as ensuring more consistent delivery and resolving issues concerning alert message audio tone and vibration cadence.” Meanwhile, “the large majority” of EAS participants “reported successful receipt and retransmission of the nationwide test” and “demonstrated that the national EAS distribution architecture is largely effective as designed.” The bureau found signs of progress compared with a similar test two years earlier. The message was received by 96.6% of EAS participants, compared with 89.3% in 2021, and the overall retransmission success rate was 93.6%, compared to 87.1%. The improvement is likely due to initiation of the 2023 test alert using common alerting protocol, “which introduced additional resiliency that was not available during the over-the-air-only 2021 nationwide test,” the bureau said. One negative was that more test participants reported equipment configuration issues and equipment failures than in 2021, the report said: “At the time of the test, approximately 23% of EAS equipment units, representing over 4,500 EAS Participants, were either using outdated software or were using equipment that no longer supported regular software updates.” Fully up-to-date gear had the highest receipt and retransmission rates. The Northern Mariana Islands, with a 20% retransmission success, and Guam, at 33.3%, had the worst success rates in the U.S. The bureau urged the FCC to consider rules “to improve the operational readiness of EAS Participants and Participating [wireless carriers], as well as ensure that EAS Participants are installing software updates in a timely manner and have plans for replacing equipment that is no longer supported by the manufacturer.” The bureau called on Congress to require all wireless carriers to support WEA and said industry can also take steps to make alerting more effective.
Contrary to some expectations, a draft order and Further NPRM allowing schools and libraries to use E-rate support for off-premises Wi-Fi hot spots and wireless internet services wasn’t expanded to include fixed wireless access and partnerships with nontraditional providers, based on the text of the draft released Thursday. Commissioners will vote July 18.
Thursday’s 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court decision in SEC v. Jarkesy could have large implications for future FCC enforcement actions, with academics, FCC attorneys and the three dissenting justices saying they expect it to prompt a storm of litigation for federal agencies.
With 90 Starlinks in orbit that have direct-to-device capability, SpaceX is talking with the FCC about ensuring that testing in international markets doesn't run afoul of agency rules. The commission can facilitate testing by ensuring experimental authority defers to local authorities in those international markets, SpaceX said in a docket 23-135 filing posted Wednesday recapping meetings with FCC Space Bureau and Office of Engineering and Technology staff. It said applying the FCC's "one-size-fits-all out-of-band emissions limit" to supplemental coverage from space testing in international markets would undermine foreign regulators' development of their SCS frameworks and rules.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D. C. Circuit should overturn the FCC’s implementation of the 2023 Low Power Protection Act because it favors full-power stations, unlawfully uses data from Nielsen, and limits the number of Class A stations, according to a final brief and final reply brief from Radio Communication Corp. Tuesday. The FCC’s Class A license allocation system is “designed to protect NAB’s Clients” -- the brief defines NAB’s Clients as full-power stations -- and turns “the LPPA’s LPTV protection purpose on its head.” The FCC has said that its LPPA order followed the plain direction of the LPPA's text: The agency “correctly interpreted the statutory requirement that an eligible station ‘operate in a Designated Market Area with not more than 95,000 television households’ to mean that an eligible station must be located within a Designated Market Area that has no more than 95,000 television households,” the FCC has said. RCC has argued that the term “operates” refers to a station’s community of license rather than its Nielsen-designated market area. “There is no way for the general public, or this Court, to know how Nielsen created and maintains DMAs or even ascertain what the boundaries of Class A licensing markets are without first subscribing to Nielsen’s service in exchange for payment,” RCC said. “We do not know, and cannot verify, whether parties paid money to Nielsen to have the DMAs drawn after Congress began working on the LPPA legislation, nor whether Nielsen has altered DMAs since the LPPA was adopted, or might alter the DMAs in the future based upon its own decision-making or because a broadcaster pays for the change.” The case isn't scheduled for oral argument. Instead, a D.C. Circuit merits panel will decide it on briefs alone.
The FCC Wireless Bureau on Wednesday granted a single license in the 900 MHz broadband segment to PDV Spectrum. The license covers Marshall County, Alabama. The FCC approved an order in 2020 reallocating a 6 MHz swath in the band for broadband, while maintaining 4 MHz for narrowband operations (see 2005130057).
The Coalition for Emergency Response and Critical Infrastructure (CERCI) this week launched another attack against giving FirstNet effective control of the 4.9 GHz band. AT&T disputed CERCI’s arguments. At the FCC, CERCI filed a recent Commerce Department Office of Inspector General report, which it said found “FirstNet failed in its oversight of AT&T’s compliance with device connection targets for public safety users.” The report said the FirstNet Authority “does not have reasonable assurance that the data AT&T is reporting is accurate and reliable to support the primary program objectives of public safety adoption and use of the network.” That claim points to “a serious failure of FirstNet to meet one of its fundamental responsibilities,” a Tuesday filing in docket 07-100 said. Jim Bugel, AT&T president-FirstNet, said in a statement, “Audits and reviews like these are a routine part of government oversight designed to provide independent perspective on federal entities’ operations.” He added, “No other wireless network is subject to this robust level of scrutiny and accountability, and no other wireless network has delivered more for public safety.” AT&T welcomes the oversight, Bugel said.
Consumer advocates urged the FCC to act on a petition filed last month about using communication assistants (CA) in IP captioned telephone services (see 2406030062). The Hearing Loss Association of America, National Association for the Deaf and TDIforAccess noted in a letter Tuesday (docket 03-123) that automatic speech recognition (ASR) technology doesn't always correctly process speech with "accents, dialects, or patterns that deviate from standard American English." Without performance or accuracy standards for ASR systems used by IP CTS providers, there is "no way of knowing if the ASR systems that are being used to transcribe calls" are "more or less accurate" than calls a CA transcribes, the groups warned.
It appears House Republican leadership isn’t willing to bring the House Commerce Committee’s bipartisan privacy bill to the floor because it lacks the necessary votes to pass, members and sources close to discussions told us Wednesday.
Smart city applications are joining the list of factors driving the need for more licensed and unlicensed spectrum, spectrum and smart city experts said Wednesday during a Broadband Breakfast panel discussion. Beyond more spectrum, smart cities will require a lot of spectrum sharing and maximized use of existing allocations, they said. There isn't one route to smart cities, and the spectrum isn't needed for a single purpose, said Richard Bernhardt, Wireless ISP Association vice president-spectrum and industry. Cities rely particularly heavily on unlicensed spectrum for smart city applications, said Ryan Johnston, Next Century Cities senior policy counsel. He said municipal governments are often left out of spectrum strategy and policy discussions, even though they are becoming big consumers of spectrum. He said they should be at the table for spectrum sharing and allocation discussions.