The full FCC approved two notices of apparent liability against Florida pirate broadcasters proposing a total of just more than $385,000 in penalties, according to NALs and a release issued Friday. The NALs were each approved 3-1, with Commissioner Nathan Simington dissenting. Simington said in September that he will dissent from all proceedings involving monetary forfeitures until the FCC responds to the U.S. Supreme Court’s SEC v. Jarkesy decision (see 2409060054). The agency proposed penalties of $325,322 for Abdias Datis for operating an unauthorized station in Miami and $60,000 against Aaron Streeter over a station in Miami Gardens. The agency previously approved a $120,000 forfeiture against Datis in September for operating a station in Miami under the same name, “Unique FM.” FCC agents found the station operating in November 2024 and as recently as last month (see 2409260026). The FCC doesn’t have the authority to collect forfeitures on its own and relies on local U.S. attorneys to pursue collection. Streeter was operating a station called “Da Pound FM” that was found by FCC agents in March 2024, the release said. Streeter told the FCC then he would cease broadcasting but was found doing so again last month. “The FCC will not tolerate unlicensed radio broadcasting. It’s that simple,” said FCC Chairman Brendan Carr in the release. “Licensed radio stations have invested time and money into their operations and are relied on by the listening public for news, entertainment, and even lifesaving warnings. Pirate operations break the law and get in the way of these important services.”

FCC Administrative Law Judge Jane Halprin should rule that low-power radio and TV station owner Antonio Cesar Guel lacks the character to hold an FCC license and order him to cease and desist from “operating, controlling, managing or providing any assistance” to any FCC-licensed station, said the Enforcement Bureau in filings in the hearing proceeding (docket 23-267) posted this week. “The preponderance of the evidence” shows that Guel engaged in a sham transfer of his stations to his 17-year-old niece, falsely claimed to be an American citizen repeatedly, and made multiple false statements to the agency for years, even during the current ALJ proceeding, the EB said. Guel has also admitted to many, but not all, of the allegations against him and unsuccessfully sought a summary judgment order to end the proceeding. In depositions and testimony during the hearing proceeding, Guel, his niece and his daughter Maria Guel gave multiple conflicting statements about Antonio Guel’s relationship and level of control of multiple companies and licensees, including Mekaddesh Group Corporation, the Hispanic Family Christian Network and the Hispanic Christian Community Network. All those entities operate from the same address. “Given Mr. Guel’s pattern of brazen material misrepresentations to the Commission,” a cease and desist order “is not only legally authorized, it is necessary,” the EB said. The bureau's filings also ask Halprin to impose a forfeiture against Guel.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr sent a warning Monday to iHeartMedia about compliance with agency payola rules and gave the broadcaster 10 days to submit information on its deals with artists related to an upcoming concert, according to a letter to CEO Robert Pittman. “To the extent that radio industry executives believe that the FCC has looked the other way on ‘payola’ violations in recent years, I assure you that this FCC will not be doing that,” Carr wrote. The FCC issued an enforcement advisory on payola earlier this month (see 2502060054). The letter focused on the upcoming May 3 iHeartCountry Festival in Austin. “It would be particularly concerning to me, if on the heels of the FCC's Enforcement Advisory, iHeart is proceeding in a manner that does not comply with federal ‘payola' requirements.” Carr said he wants to know if iHeart is “secretly forcing” musicians to choose between being compensated for playing the festival or receiving less favorable airplay. The letter gave iHeart 10 days to inform the FCC about the artists playing the concert, their typical compensation, their compensation for playing iHeart’s event, and whether those deals involve airplay. It also asked for information on iHeart's payola policy, whether it shared the FCC enforcement advisory with stations, and any specific training given to employees at the festival on FCC rules.

Oral argument in NAB’s challenge of the FCC’s foreign-sponsored content rules is scheduled for April 7, said a clerk’s order Friday in docket 24-1296 at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. NAB has argued that the FCC didn’t give proper notice that the rules would apply to all non-candidate political advertising, while the FCC under former Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel said the rules were properly imposed and authorized by Congress. As a commissioner, current Chairman Brendan Carr dissented in part from the rules, also arguing that the agency didn’t give broadcasters enough notice. When a Carr-opposed order from the Rosenworcel administration was the subject of oral argument in the 5th Circuit earlier this month, the FCC declined to defend portions of it (see 2502040061).

The FCC and FTC should improve the audience measurement of Spanish-language broadcasters, a host of such broadcasters told FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez and FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya at a roundtable Wednesday at Florida International University. Gomez and Bedoya said they would seek to “continue the conversation” and hold further roundtables on the issue. “This sounds like something industry needs to sit and figure out,” Gomez said. Asked about the chances of the FTC intervening, Bedoya said it would be important to show his Republican colleagues that the matter involves market failure and is not related to diversity, equity and inclusion. “I’m going to be very blunt: That brand -- DEI -- is not in favor right now. This is not about that.” Nielsen uses overly small sample sizes to determine audiences for Spanish-language broadcasters, leading to inaccurate measurements and fluctuating ratings, the broadcasters said. Nielsen didn’t immediately comment and didn’t attend the panel, though Bedoya said the company was invited. Two households leaving a ratings panel can cause a station’s ratings to be cut in half, said Entravision Chief Governmental Affairs Officer Marcelo Gaete. “Six thousand Latinos are deciding the fate of 50 million,” said Stephanie Valencia, owner of the Latino Media Network. The broadcasters mentioned Nielsen’s lack of competition as the reason the company hasn't improved how it handles Spanish-language broadcasting. “They need to have skin in the game,” Gaete said. Nielsen is “an unregulated monopoly,” said Raul Alarcon, CEO of Spanish Broadcasting System.

Addressing the FCC’s recent enforcement actions against broadcast networks, former Democratic FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said Wednesday that the commission should move quickly on current Chairman Brendan Carr’s proposal for a proceeding on the meaning of the FCC’s public interest standard (see 2412060067) so that boundaries are clear. In an article for the Brookings Institution, Wheeler said using “ill-defined government policy as a tool of political coercion is something that is historically associated with authoritarian governments.” The public interest proceeding would not only help eliminate the vagueness that plagues the chairman’s current interpretation, but it would also identify how he would enforce the rules when applied to broadcasters "that are much more one-sided in their support of [President Donald Trump's] policies,” Wheeler said. The proceeding should include a proposed definition from Carr, followed by an open public debate and an FCC vote, he said. The FCC chair’s power "to interpret the vague public interest doctrine invites its politicization,” he said. “Simply rattling the chairman’s saber can have a chilling effect on editorial and business decisions.”

The full FCC should reverse the Media Bureau’s dismissal of the Media and Democracy Project’s (MAD) petition against Fox’s WTXF Philadelphia, MAD said in an application for review Tuesday. The petition's dismissal under former FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel (see 2501160081) was “politically manipulated” and intended to add “a patina of impartiality” to the contemporaneous dismissal of complaints against ABC, NBC and CBS, MAD said. Those complaints, from the Center for American Rights (CAR), weren’t based on court findings and “did not rise to the level” of the WTXF petition, MAD said. “In rescinding the three CAR decisions, while leaving the MAD decision to stand, [FCC Chairman Brendan] Carr doubled down on Rosenworcel’s biased, politically motivated adjudications,” the group said (see 2501220059). “It is not the duty of the FCC chair, whether a Republican or a Democrat, to play politics with legal proceedings,” and both parties' chairs "failed [in] their statutory duty.” The Media Bureau was incorrect not to consider the factual record and court findings from the litigation against Fox by Dominion Voting Systems over Fox’s 2020 election coverage, MAD said. It also disputed that its case against WTXF violates the First Amendment. “The question before the Commission is not whether Fox had a right to dissemble, rather it is about the consequences of those lies and the impact on Fox’s character qualifications to remain a Commission licensee.”

Broadcasters must be able to report the news without government retaliation and need the FCC to scrap ownership limits, said NAB President Curtis LeGeyt during a Media Institute speech Wednesday. “Our democracy relies on journalists’ ability to report the news without the risk of government retribution,” he said. “Efforts to limit the ability of broadcasters to report the facts hinders the public’s right to know and chills free speech.” The FCC should eliminate the national ownership cap, or it risks damaging emergency alerting and local news, LeGeyt added. “Without a necessary course correction in our ability to compete for local advertising, local newsrooms will continue to downsize, robbing the community of its voice," he said. “Eliminating these regulations will allow local stations to aggregate resources, invest in journalism and strengthen their service to communities.”

Broadcasters’ legal challenge of the FCC’s 2018 quadrennial review (QR) order is set for oral argument in the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on March 19, said a filing in docket 24-1380 Friday. Petitioners Zimmer Radio, Nexstar, NAB, Beasley Media and Tri-State Communications have argued that the order violated the Communications Act because it didn’t roll back any broadcast ownership rules and ignored the increased competition faced by broadcasters. The FCC has previously argued in the case that the law doesn’t compel it to deregulate and that broadcasters haven’t shown that they face competition in local programming, but that could change under the agency’s new leadership. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr dissented from the QR order as a commissioner, calling its view of competition “ostrich-like.” Earlier this month, the agency kicked off oral argument over workforce diversity data collection by announcing it wouldn’t defend portions of the order (see 2502040061), which Carr also opposed as a commissioner.

“There is an obvious public interest in there being live media coverage of police street activity,” said Cato Institute Senior Fellow Walter Olson in a blog post Tuesday about the FCC’s investigation of a radio station that reported on Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids (see 2502050051). “Allowing the media to be scared away from reporting on police raids” takes the country “closer to a society where the media dare not report in real time on police raids at all, or even to one in which there might happen secret raids.” Media reporting “can expose bad practices by police, and it can also reassure by helping to establish that police practice was proper,” he said. The FCC’s investigation of the station “inevitably invites comparison with other speech-chilling steps taken under the new chairmanship of Brendan Car,” he added, pointing to the FCC’s investigation of CBS over news distortion (see 2502120041). “Vigilance is always in order when it comes to the FCC and speech rights, and perhaps more now than ever.”