The FCC released its broadband consumer labels Thursday, requiring ISPs to display machine-readable information at the point of sale. The order, adopted Nov. 14, requires providers to list monthly prices and itemized fees, whether it participates in the affordable connectivity program, and speed data. The order takes effect 30 days after Federal Register publication. Compliance with the rules is not required until one year after OMB approval for providers with 100,000 or fewer subscribers and six months for all other providers. The goal is to "make the purchasing of broadband service more simple and more competitive for consumers everywhere," said Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel. Commissioner Geoffrey Starks said he looks forward to reviewing the record on whether the labels should include cybersecurity information. Doing so "could be very valuable to consumers" and "push ISPs to compete on network security," Starks said. The commission adopted one label requiring the same information in the same format for fixed and mobile broadband providers. Providers must include information about latency. It's "important to any application involving users interacting with each other, a device, or an application," the order said. An accompanying NPRM seeks comment on "alternative speed and latency measurements for the label going forward." The NPRM also seeks comment on the label's accessibility and availability in multiple languages, other performance data, and network management information. Comments will be due 30 days after Federal Register publication, 60 days for replies. The new label will "help consumers better understand their internet access purchases" and "allow for an effective apples-to-apples comparison tool when shopping for services in the marketplace," said Wireless ISP Association Vice President-Policy Louis Peraertz. It's a "good first step," said Next Century Cities Senior Policy Counsel Ryan Johnston: "Without including the label on a consumer's bill, the broadband nutrition label falls short of its goal."
The California Public Utilities Commission voted 5-0 Thursday to update rules for the California Advanced Services Fund (CASF) broadband infrastructure grant account (docket R.20-08-021). The changes are part of the CPUC’s implementation of California’s $6 billion broadband law last year. One significant change in the decision updates speed requirements for completed projects to 100 Mbps download and 20 Mbps upload, “which ensures that public funds support projects that deliver the speeds necessary for videoconferencing, streaming and supporting multiple users in a household,” said Commissioner Darcie Houck at the CPUC’s virtual meeting. Revising the definition of an unserved location to places lacking speeds of at least 25/3 Mbps will make more areas eligible for funding, she said. Also, the decision requires grantees to provide low-income broadband plans and participate in the federal affordable connectivity program. The changes are "vital in achieving the state's broadband objectives,” said CPUC President Alice Busching Reynolds. Commissioner Cliff Rechtschaffen applauded the decision for recognizing that affordability continues to be a major issue for many Californians: "It's not just access.” Consumer advocates mostly supported the draft in comments last month, but telecom companies raised concerns with proposed changes to the challenge process in the broadband support program (see 2210210055). Also, industry expressed concern about the staff’s proposal to require applicants to freeze prices in project areas for at least five years.
Pennsylvania is seeking “equitable, affordable, and robust high-speed broadband infrastructure and services connecting Pennsylvania for the 21st century and beyond,” said a state broadband plan adopted Thursday. The Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority board approved the plan in a unanimous voice vote at a partially virtual meeting Thursday. Authority Executive Director Brandon Carson said the shot clock is now running to develop the plans required by NTIA to get Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) federal funding.
Industry and state broadband officials emphasized the need for better data on broadband availability and public-private partnerships as NTIA prepares to administer its broadband, equity, access and deployment program, speaking at USTelecom's broadband investment forum Wednesday. Some raised concerns about regulatory requirements in the BEAD program and ensuring state broadband offices are prepared to administer funding to subgrantees.
NEW ORLEANS -- State regulators’ telecom priority in the year ahead will be “trying to deploy where broadband isn’t,” said new NARUC President Michael Caron in an interview at the association’s conference here. Caron hopes new FCC broadband maps coming Friday will be more accurate and include more people who lack service, he said. On a Monday panel about the maps, state commissioners asked an FCC official if the agency is up to the task and what states can do to help.
The FCC encouraged entities interested in applying for the affordable connectivity program's outreach grants to present "innovative outreach strategies" that can be implemented at the multistate or national level, due to the limited funding available, said Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau staff during a webinar Tuesday. Attendees sought guidance on how to navigate the application process and how the bureau will base its funding decisions.
The House planned to vote as soon as Monday night on the Ensuring Phone and Internet Access Through Lifeline and Affordable Connectivity Program Act (HR-4275) under suspension of the rules, said the office of Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Friday. HR-4275, previously known as the Ensuring Phone and Internet Access for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Recipients Act, would require the FCC to do a report on the number of SNAP participants enrolled in the Lifeline and affordable connectivity programs. The House Commerce Committee unanimously advanced the measure in July (see 2207130066).
Applications for the FCC's affordable connectivity program national outreach grants and tribal outreach grants are due by Jan. 9, said a notice of funding opportunity released Thursday (see 2209200076). A separate notice for the Your Home, Your Internet and ACP navigator pilot grant programs will be released Nov. 21, said a news release. "Our outreach partners have already demonstrated creativity, perseverance, and a continued commitment to ensuring everyone, everywhere has the internet connections they need," said Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, "and these outreach grants aim to supercharge those successful efforts.”
The electoral battle for control of Congress remained unresolved Thursday, but former FCC officials agree with other communications sector observers (see 2210310073) that Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel is likely to face less critical oversight if the GOP wins either chamber than would otherwise be expected because the current 2-2 split commission has spawned relatively little controversy. NTIA could face more of the heat, experts told us. Tech policy stakeholders, meanwhile, expect a shift in the direction on Big Tech-focused legislation under GOP majorities.
A coalition of industry groups proposed allowing providers participating in the FCC's affordable connectivity program the option to provide an "average net rate charged" to households for each tier of supported services in each five-digit ZIP code as part of the program's mandatory data collection. It would allow the commission to determine "at a geographically granular level" how many households are receiving service "with no out-of-pocket expense" and the average price for households that are "subscribing to broadband services that are not fully covered by the ACP benefit," said the Competitive Carriers Association, CTIA, NCTA and USTelecom in a letter posted Wednesday in docket 21-450. The mandatory collection could include a monthly rate for "each ACP-supported service tier" and the number of subscribers in a ZIP code, they said. The groups asked the FCC to disclose its data "on an aggregate basis" and within ranges for speeds or monthly data allowance to maintain providers' and consumer privacy. The groups also asked that data be aggregated to a higher geographic level if fewer than three providers are "in a geographic unit."