The FCC looks set to make a decision by Jan. 21 on whether access charges should apply to switched-IP traffic. That’s the commission’s deadline to answer a forbearance request on the question by Feature Group IP. Last week, the FCC circulated two draft orders on the Feature Group petition, which asked the commission to declare that switched-IP traffic isn’t subject to access charges applying to switched traffic. Chairman Kevin Martin put out versions of the order granting and refusing relief, an FCC official said. Feature Group is a competitive local exchange carrier that provides service to VoIP companies. If the FCC doesn’t answer the petition by Jan. 21, it will be deemed granted under the statutory forbearance rules. A commission spokeswoman declined to comment. Meanwhile, the FCC is likely to extend the due date on a contrary forbearance petition by Embarq, which asked the FCC to declare that access charges do apply to switched-IP traffic, two FCC officials said. The 12-month deadline for the Embarq petition is Sunday, but nothing has been circulated, they said.
Adam Bender
Adam Bender, Deputy Managing Editor for Privacy Daily. Bender leads a team of journalists and reports on state privacy legislation, rulemaking and litigation. In previous roles at Communications Daily, he covered telecom and internet policy in the states, Congress and at the FCC. He has won awards for his reporting from the Society of Professional Journalists (SPJ), Specialized Information Publishers Association (SIPA) and the Society for Advancing Business Editing and Writing (SABEW). Bender studied print journalism at American University and is the author of multiple dystopian sci-fi novels. Keep up to date with Bender by reading his blog and following him on social media including Bluesky, Mastodon and LinkedIn.
The FCC commissioners should review a Wireline Bureau decision approving compliance plans by AT&T, Verizon and Qwest, Sprint Nextel said Tuesday. The companies had to get bureau approval of the plans to satisfy a condition in forbearance orders granting them relief from cost-assignment rules (CD Jan 5 p1). “Because the decision was announced without any analysis or explanation, we believe it requires the full review of the commission,” a Sprint spokesman said. His company or another opponent of cost-assignment forbearance could file a formal request for review soon, he said. Multiple reconsideration petitions on the forbearance orders are at the FCC. Opponents want to keep the ball in the air until more sympathetic commissioners take over, a wireline industry official said. Opponents would probably be less likely to file such a request if a harsher FCC were expected, the source said. The Wireline Bureau approval makes it tougher for Sprint and other opponents to overturn the original forbearance orders, the official said. Once rules are carried out and new processes put in place, they will be harder to rewind, the official said.
Former FCC chairmen and commissioners urged structural and procedural change for the next commission, at a forum Monday hosted by Public Knowledge. Reed Hundt and Bill Kennard, who were chairmen under President Bill Clinton, urged the next FCC to take a fresh look at streamlining the commission and the communications market. In a separate panel, former commissioners and others warned the next FCC not to lose focus on strategic goals.
The FCC freed AT&T, Verizon and Qwest from various accounting and reporting rules. Late Wednesday, the Wireline Bureau granted each of the carriers’ compliance plans, which showed how the companies will continue giving the commission usable accounting data the agency requests once orders granting them forbearance on cost-assignment and Automated Reporting Management Information System rules take effect.
An overhaul of intercarrier compensation and the Universal Service Fund could upset broadband deployment and hurt companies in and outside the telecom industry, telecom interests warned in reply comments this week. Replies were due Monday on three FCC overhaul plans. Though many arguments were repeats from the initial comment round, some new faces appeared, including the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service, and associations for utilities and payphone providers.
With little more than a week left before deaf consumers can get 10-digit phone numbers for Internet-based telecom relay services, the FC released details on its implementation plan. Late Friday, in a second report and order, and order on reconsideration, the commission tackled 911 implementation, user registration processes and numbering costs, among other issues.
Sprint Nextel urged the FCC to strengthen its legal argument for keeping a $0.0007 rate for ISP-bound traffic. In a reconsideration petition filed last week, Sprint said it agreed with the FCC’s November order responding to the remand of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. But the order -- now facing an appeal in that court -- could be improved by adding an alternative argument, Sprint said: “Given the complexity of the statutory scheme, the lengthy history of litigation concerning compensation for carrying ISP-bound traffic, and the pending petition for review filed by Core Communications in the D.C. Circuit, the Commission would be well-served by relying on two alternative legal theories.”
The FCC appears to be a year behind on a Regulatory Flexibility Act duty to annually review regulations adopted ten years previously. Thursday, the commission sought comments on the possible revision or elimination of rules adopted by the agency in 1997, which “have, or might have, a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” Comments are due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register. The agency sought comment on 1996 rules on Nov. 12, 2006, but released no public notice about 1997 rules until Thursday. An FCC spokeswoman said the report on 1997 rules was finished at the end of 2007, but the agency had to circulate it through all its bureaus and offices. Usually circulation is finished by the second quarter, but the 2007 report “got behind,” she said. The 1998 report is finished, and now circulating the commission, she said.
A federal court denied an appeal related to the timeliness of an FCC forbearance order. In a petition for review at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, competitive local exchange carrier Fones4All said the FCC improperly released a backdated forbearance order one day after the statutory clock ran out. Citing two decisions by the D.C. Circuit, the court said Fones4All couldn’t challenge the timeliness issue in court until it appealed at the FCC. The court also upheld the FCC’s order on the merits.
Verizon’s forbearance petition on reporting requirements remains active, though the carrier got some relief last week in an FCC order on a similar Qwest petition. Late Friday, the commission conditionally granted Qwest forbearance from Automated Reporting Management Information System requirements related to financial data and extended the relief to Verizon and AT&T (CD Dec 15 p1). A footnote in the Qwest order said, “We address the merits of Verizon’s requests with respect to the ARMIS Financial Reports in this Order. To the extent that Verizon’s petition seeks other regulatory relief, those requests remain pending.” The FCC must still deal with Verizon’s request for relief from maintaining Continuing Property Records, said a spokesman for the carrier. The order pleased Qwest, said Shirley Bloomfield, a senior vice president. “The structure of the telecommunications marketplace has dramatically changed since these rules were established many years ago and the reports are no longer relevant or meaningful in today’s environment.”