Satellite, Wireless Interests Urge C-Band Certification Clarity

relocation coordinator instead of via certification challenges. It urged the Wireless Bureau to clarify that the 30-day period in the challenge and reply process for announcing cert deficiencies applies to initial and refiled certifications. T-Mobile said the bureau should clarify when overlay licensees can use the 3.7 GHz spectrum in the partial economic areas where they won the auction, since there's potential for approval of different certifications at different times by various satellite operators. It said if one satellite operator submits a validated cert by the relevant accelerated relocation deadline, auction winners should be allowed to access their licensed spectrum by that deadline. It argued against challenges to refiled certs being limited to the new information, since the amendment is to replace the original. Make clear that if a C-band satellite operator can address a challenge without amending that cert, it may do so, Eutelsat asked. It said the bureau should require each challenger to demonstrate how it qualifies as a “relevant stakeholder,” and staff should let satellite operators and challengers seek confidential treatment for eligible information that's in their agreement. Intelsat said there seems to be no requirement that challenges focus on potential deficiencies specific to the C-band order's requirements and not to matters outside of phase 1 C-band clearing implementation. It sought clarity on how the bureau will screen for the entities that are “relevant” and have standing to challenge satellite operator certs. Not making that clear could "open the door to abusive challenges based on competitive or commercial motivations," it said. The process the FCC proposes could stretch the time frame for determining the validity of a certification by weeks to years, SES said, urging instead sticking with 60 days for resolution. It said amended or refiled cert shouldn't trigger a new challenge cycle.