CWA, Others Support Locals' Challenge to FCC September Order
The FCC overreached with its September infrastructure order to streamline 5G small-cells deployment, said Communications Workers of America, the National Digital Inclusion Alliance and Public Knowledge in an amicus brief Monday at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. Intervenor…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
briefs were due Monday, after initial briefs last week (see 1906100021). “To protect public welfare and address the digital divide, states and localities must be able to charge appropriate fees,” said the CWA brief. The FCC shifted (in Pacer) political responsibility for unpopular rules to local governments, said the Association of Washington Cities. “The FCC failed to consider that the regulatory structure it created must be implemented by local government agencies whose powers and authority are structured, pursuant to and limited by the laws under which they are created.” Forcing localities to act quickly on applications threatens public safety, they said. Municipal utilities should be exempt to federal pre-emption on small cells, said Missouri River Energy Services (MRES), representing energy utilities in Iowa, Minnesota, North Dakota and South Dakota. Municipal utilities act in a proprietary capacity, and “the FCC's understanding of federal preemption is at best inapplicable to municipal utilities,” it said (in Pacer). MRES members are in two states with small-cells laws exempting municipal utilities, and one in Marshall, Minnesota, negotiated a small-cells agreement without needing FCC action, it said. "Their experience with collocation of small wireless facilities does not support the FCC’s Order and affirms that the issue should be left to state and local control.” The Berkshire-Litchfield Environmental Council (BLEC) supported (in Pacer) Maryland’s Montgomery County, which argued the agency inadequately addressed comments on the FCC's outdated RF emission standards. Studies show negative biological and environmental effects of 5G wireless exposure, said BLEC. Small cells have amplified RF safety concerns (see 1906140050).