Caution Urged in Rate-of-Return FCC Replies
The FCC shouldn’t leave states in the cold as the commission mulls changes to rate-of-return rules for carrier cost recovery, said the Michigan Public Service Commission. The regulator and others filed reply comments that were due Monday in docket 10-90.…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
The Michigan PSC said the FCC shouldn’t reduce or eliminate existing reporting requirements including Form 481, and urged the federal agency to reject the tentative conclusion that eligible telecom carriers (ETCs) shouldn't file a copy of Form 481 with states. Filling out and sending the form doesn’t cost much to telecom companies, but provides valuable information used by state regulators to prevent waste, fraud and abuse, the PSC said. Developing an online tool to permit access to all information submitted by ETCs is a good idea but shouldn’t exempt providers from filing a copy of Form 481 with states, it said. The PSC opposed removing service quality standards and consumer protection rules for ETC certification. “Many states, including Michigan, no longer have service quality and consumer protection standards due to deregulation,” it said. “Eliminating this requirement could create an environment for fraud and abuse and have the opposite effect of what the FCC intends.” Separately, rural carriers continued to warn about possible unintended consequences from sweeping changes, as they had in the first round of comments (see 1605130035). The FCC should “avoid injecting substantial administrative burdens and regulatory uncertainty into time-tested systems through subjective changes that will end up becoming a form of ‘Monday Morning Quarterbacking’ with respect to carrier operations,” NTCA said. “Instead, the Commission should focus its efforts on providing targeted prospective clarity where needed under existing rules to achieve policy objectives, promote certainty, and ensure accountability.” WTA said efficient USF spending is an important goal, but it shouldn't come at the cost of effective broadband deployment in rural areas. Acknowledging the complexity of the docket, the National Tribal Telecommunications Association urged the FCC to tackle tribal broadband issues first and separately from other issues. “The acceleration of broadband deployment on Tribal lands must be addressed as soon as possible and should not be delayed while the Commission resolves the multitude of additional complex issues raised in the Notice,” NTTA said.