Harvard Business School Prof. Clayton Christensen warned Wed. tha...
Harvard Business School Prof. Clayton Christensen warned Wed. that the Bells could face the same challenges that deeply wounded integrated steel companies in the U.S., losing much of their revenue base to mini-mills - low cost “innovators” that now…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
own half the market. Christensen, a best-selling author, addressed the future of the telecom sector during a speech at the National Press Club. Christensen warned that “disruptive” technologies pose the biggest threat to incumbents like the Bells, citing the steel industry example. Mini-mill operators with their low cost technologies were able to offer steel at 20% below the costs of their larger competitors. Initially, they captured the most- undervalued market segment - rebar or steel used to reinforce cement, he said. Soon, they captured much of the rest. Mini-mill success led to the collapse of prices in the market, with low-cost competitors fighting each other for market share, Christensen said: “Entrants tend to beat the incumbents when they engage in a disruptive strategy. They create a situation where [incumbents] flee rather than fight.” Christensen said it’s not clear how the Bells will fare vs. challengers like Vonage as VoIP becomes more of a disruptive factor in the market. “In almost every instance the disruptive technology appears to the incumbent as a threat and to the entrant as a growth opportunity,” he said: “In the end it always proves to be both. It’s the destruction that by making something simple and affordable creates a new wave of growth. There’s no reason why the incumbent couldn’t cause the growth to happen themselves.”