Some House Commerce subcommittees plan a hearing Oct. 16 on corporate responsibility online, consumer protection and Communications Decency Act Section 230. It will "explore whether online companies are appropriately using the tools they have ... to foster a healthier Internet,” said committee Chairman Frank Pallone, D-N.J.; Communications Subcommittee Chairman Mike Doyle, D-Pa.; and Consumer Protection Subcommittee Chair Jan Schakowsky, D-Ill., in a statement.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., will host a meeting with Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Friday, House Commerce Committee ranking member Greg Walden, R-Ore., told us Thursday. Zuckerberg had dinner Wednesday with Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., and other senators, and Thursday meetings with Sens. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Josh Hawley, R-Mo., among other visits. Walden told us he plans to attend the meeting with McCarthy and others, saying he favors Congress taking a hard look at Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Tech platforms are in a difficult position being told not to act as editors and publishers and to moderate content, Walden said.
It’s unlikely Congress will pass legislation altering Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., told reporters Wednesday. “If I could wave a magic wand, I might make nuanced changes, but I think realistically you’re not going to see a statute passed changing that section anytime soon. Considering what it takes to get a bill passed and signed into law.”
Introducing a privacy bill bilaterally with Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., separate from the Senate Commerce Committee working group, is a “thought,” Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., told reporters Thursday. After the group’s apparent fracturing, focus shifted (see 1908010043) to bilateral negotiations between Chairman Roger Wicker, R-Miss., and ranking member Maria Cantwell, D-Wash. But Moran and Blumenthal are continuing their own talks, though Blumenthal claims the group is moving forward as one.
Google will pay $170 million to settle allegations that YouTube illegally collected personal data from children without parental consent, the FTC said Wednesday in a 3-2 party line vote.
The White House’s potential draft executive order directing the FCC and the FTC to police social media content moderation blatantly violates the First Amendment and is likely to face years of legal battle, representatives from the tech industry and academia told us. Days before President Donald Trump’s proposal emerged, senators from both parties said the tech industry’s content liability shield, which the draft order seeks to modify (see 1908090053), needs re-examining.
After years of work, the 3.5 GHz citizens broadband radio service band appears ready to open for business, as early as next month, FCC Commissioner Mike O’Rielly told us. O’Rielly predicted an FCC decision soon on the C band, and said the agency may not need to review CBS' buy of Viacom. O’Rielly insisted relations have improved among commissioners.
ASPEN, Colo. -- DOJ likes its chances of prevailing with its structural remedies on T-Mobile's buy of Sprint and a divestiture to Dish Network, said Antitrust Division head Makan Delrahim in an interview after a Technology Policy Institute Q&A. About a dozen states sued to block the deal. Also at TPI, Delrahim confirmed his department and several states are probing tech issues. He wouldn't object to a look by others at Communications Decency Act Section 230.
ASPEN, Colo. -- Heightened policymaker and public scrutiny of the tech industry doesn't amount to a full-scale backlash, panelists generally agreed (see page 2). That may change as skepticism increases, one tech critic told a Technology Policy Institute audience. Since potential antitrust changes to perceived tech problems could take many years, if not a decade-plus, don't look for remedies there, TPI was told Monday.
Beto O’Rourke supports amending the tech industry’s content liability shield to combat online hate speech and related violence, the Democratic presidential candidate said in a plan released Friday. He envisions amending Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to “remove legal immunity from lawsuits for large social media platforms that fail to change their terms of service” or implement systems designed to remove hateful content. Large platforms would be required to adopt terms of service banning content that incites or engages in “violence, intimidation, harassment, threats, or defamation targeting an individual or group based on their actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, immigration status, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or disability.” O’Rourke targets the right problems, said Free Press Action Senior Policy Counsel Carmen Scurato, but his vague proposal could weaken Section 230 and impair platforms’ ability to moderate. The campaign didn’t comment.