Industry forces battered the tentative principles put forth by the NARUC Telecom Task Force, saying they're out of touch and potentially harmful, while consumer and rural advocates praised the way they elevate the state role. The association of state regulators assembled the task force at its fall meeting (CD Nov 14 p5) and offered up an initial statement of principles for comment, which were due March 8. The comments were posted Friday. The principles outline states’ roles in overseeing consumer protection, public safety and reliability concerns, competition, broadband access, affordability and adoption, interconnection, universal service and regulatory diversity, all in a way that preserves evidence-based decision-making (http://bit.ly/VFfk6k). NARUC President Philip Jones has said the task force’s end goal will be a new version of the association’s 2005 white paper on federalism, to be issued later this year.
The uncertain amount of paperwork the FCC requires is scaring Iowa telcos. The FCC has yet to firmly say whether it’s reducing the amount of paperwork required for companies that receive high-cost USF support, the Iowa Telecom Association told the Iowa Utilities Board in a Wednesday filing (http://bit.ly/WgAg2z). The federal deadline for filing paperwork is July 1, but “the comment period governing some of the section 54.313 rules and reporting forms [on paperwork reduction] extends until April 26, 2013, thus final approval of the section 53.313 rules and reporting forms may not be known until a date close to when the July 1, 2013, filings are due,” the association said. But there are rules in Iowa that call for the state’s telcos to file “duplicative” filings on May 1 as part of an annual report to that state commission, it added. The telcos ask that the Iowa regulators bump back the state deadline to July 1 to accommodate the uncertainty of the paperwork involved in the federal filing.
Several CEOs and general managers of small telcos wrote to President Barack Obama this week to highlight the effects of the FCC’s “flash-cut elimination” of Safety Net Additive (SNA) support in the 2011 USF/intercarrier compensation order. SNA has historically provided small rural telcos with USF support over a five-year period starting two years after qualifying investments are made. In its order, the FCC “unfairly eliminated the mechanism looking backward for carriers who made qualifying investments in 2010 and 2011 -- prior to the release of the FCC’s order,” the letter said. That provision “threatens to undermine steps taken in the past few years to deploy broadband-capable communications networks,” it said. “Although the amount of SNA support at issue is relatively small in the grand scheme of things,” the $5 million to $10 million in support that “has been yanked away” will make it harder to pay down Rural Utilities Service loans and harder to keep prices low for consumers, the letter said. “We ask that you please encourage the FCC to reconsider the retroactive, flash-cut elimination of SNA support and to address the risk it poses to our shared public policy objectives."
Gig.U Executive Director Blair Levin is “very supportive of the notion” of the FCC’s Gigabit City Challenge, announced earlier this year, he told the Institute for Local Self-Reliance during a Tuesday podcast (http://bit.ly/10H08Dy). In January, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski urged that every state include at least one gigabit-speed city (CD Jan 22 p1). Levin managed the creation of the National Broadband Plan and has focused on helping to create such fast networks. “The question to me is what does the FCC do about it?” Levin said. “The FCC is an agency with immense powers in a variety of different ways, and I'd love to see them actively engaged in the pursuit of this goal and not just simply saying others should do it.” He said it “remains to be seen” how effective the initiative will be, citing the FCC’s announced workshops and a hope they'll invite “the right people” in evaluating policies across all government levels. “I don’t want to use universal service as a way of keeping everybody low,” Levin reflected later, noting it shouldn’t be used as an excuse not to innovate. “It troubles me when you look at the fastest cities in the world that none of them are in the United States because I think that’s where innovation is going to come from.” One key going forward will be to figure out how to ensure networks meet certain societal needs, which the free market may not do on its own -- needs such as 911 service, network resiliency during disasters and wiring schools, he said. The FCC’s November 2011 USF order contained good things but isn’t “a once-in-a-generation transformation of universal service,” Levin said, describing a coming transformation from the four major telcos bringing wireless 4G broadband into rural areas. He noted that “undoubtedly” the government will “need to look at the system again” when that happens.
Missouri consumers of local and intrastate long-distance wireline service will pay a lower USF surcharge as of July 1, the Missouri Public Service Commission said Tuesday. “Currently, the surcharge percentage of .0025 translates to 12.5 cents on a $50 bill,” the PSC said (http://on.mo.gov/16shQ1T). “With this reduction, the percentage of .0017 translates to 8.5 cents on a $50 bill."
New proposed state laws may interfere as Texas fights to reorganize its state USF, which provides several hundreds of millions of dollars a year, and reduce the support it gives out by the start of 2014. The Legislature previously demanded its state regulators make the changes. The Texas Public Utility Commission tried to begin that process in a docket this year, but has encountered resistance from telcos that suggest the Legislature may modify its USF laws yet again in the current session.
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., plans to focus on FirstNet and unveil his vision for the future of the E-rate program at Tuesday’s FCC oversight hearing, a committee spokesman told us Monday. Rockefeller plans to tell all five commissioners that they must evaluate the success of one of his key education accomplishments, the E-rate program, and address its future needs at the 2:30 p.m. hearing in 253 Russell. The last time all the commissioners faced the panel was in May, shortly after the nominations of commissioners Ajit Pai and Jessica Rosenworcel were confirmed by the Senate. Only Chairman Julius Genachowski and Republican Robert McDowell will offer opening remarks at the hearing, several industry lobbyists told us. The Telecommunications Industry Association separately asked lawmakers to urge the FCC to “promptly” implement the voluntary spectrum incentive auction, reallocate federal spectrum for commercial wireless use, reform USF and streamline FCC regulations, in a letter sent Monday.
Observers disagreed on the FCC’s legal authority to implement the sweeping reforms in its 2011 USF/intercarrier compensation order, which is now the subject of a challenge in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The commission argued in briefs Wednesday that its order was reasonable and grounded in law (CD March 7 p3). Analysts differed on the order’s chances of being upheld, but agreed that the key legal issues will be the scope of the FCC’s jurisdiction, and the true meaning of Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act. Oral argument is set for Nov. 19 in Denver.
Georgia legislators’ attempt to restrict municipal broadband failed Thursday night in a 94-70 House vote. But House Bill 282, introduced last month, echoing a failed Georgia bill last year and laws in other states, skyrocketed into a national debate about municipal networks this year before dying on the House floor. Vigorous back and forth occurred among legislators before the evening vote and carried over into stirrings of victory and lamentation Friday.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai threw his weight behind an IP pilot program, based on AT&T’s proposal for deregulatory trials in various wire centers around the country, in a speech Thursday at the Hudson Institute (http://bit.ly/WNAjif). The program would allow “forward-looking companies” to select wire centers where they could “turn off their old TDM electronics and migrate consumers to an all-IP platform.” Some criticized Pai’s proposal as going even further than AT&T’s original “beta trials,” warning that the deregulatory proposal could harm consumers without leading to any real data.