CEI: Time to End the Universal Service Regime
The design of the U.S. universal service subsidy regime is inherently flawed and lacks strong oversight, Competitive Enterprise Institute Senior Policy Analyst Solveig Singleton wrote this week. Rather than reform, it should be scrapped in favor of a market-centered policy…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
that would better provide universal service at a reasonable price, she said. Existing universal service mechanisms "are unnecessary, price- and market-distortive, wasteful, and unaccountable [and] amount to a regressive and constitutionally inappropriate tax." Singleton said subsidies to high-cost areas "are no longer necessary," since mobile and satellite service have eliminated such areas. USF is also made superfluous by other subsidy programs supporting the deployment of advanced services, she added. Instead, she argued in favor of "voucher-type subsidies for low-income users," as that approach -- funded from general tax revenue -- "would limit distortion of consumers’ and carriers’ decisions." Any subsidies for rural health care and educational institutions should be funded from general revenue as well, she said. "Competitive neutrality would be restored."