Telecom companies balked at consumer advocates’ call to apply California carrier of last resort (COLR) obligations to broadband. The California Public Utilities Commission posted reply comments Thursday in a rulemaking about how to update the state’s 30-year-old COLR rules (docket R.24-06-012). In initial comments last month, carriers subject to COLR requirements asked that the CPUC shed those obligations in many parts of the state, while consumer advocates said COLR obligations remain necessary and should be updated to include high-speed internet service, not just voice (see 2410020037). Frontier Communications replied Wednesday that it opposes expanding the proceeding to do “a complex, controversial evaluation of legal and policy matters pertaining to the Commission’s potential regulation of broadband services.” Likewise, Consolidated Communications said the CPUC should "decline the invitation to undertake a substantial review of its regulatory jurisdiction over broadband services.” TDS protested that the consumer groups "seek to greatly expand this OIR beyond its intended purpose” without providing factual or legal reasons. Don’t let public advocates "transform this … into a generic telecommunications industry reexamination docket,” said a coalition of small rural local exchange carriers. Representing cable companies, the California Broadband and Video Association warned that adding broadband to the definition of a basic service or extending COLR obligations to broadband providers would be federally preempted. Meanwhile, the CPUC’s independent Public Advocates Office pushed back on companies that said COLR obligations are outdated and should be eliminated. "In reality, the COLR concept remains essential to the guarantee of universal service, but must be updated to reflect the state’s transformed telecommunications landscape,” PAO said. AT&T disagreed. "Maintaining COLR obligations where they are superfluous would divert resources from vital broadband investments to outdated [time division multiplexed] networks, which are increasingly unwanted by consumers,” the carrier said. “It would not only stifle competition by arbitrarily constraining ILECs alone but also result in unnecessary operational costs and increased environmental harm due to prolonged use of copper networks.”
The California Public Utilities Commission should consider recent federal actions on incarcerated people's communications services (IPCS) before adopting a permanent intrastate rate cap, industry and consumer groups argued in comments posted Wednesday. However, The Utility Reform Network (TURN) and Center for Accessible Technology (CforAT) suggested lowering the cap again on an interim basis. The CPUC received comments Tuesday on a Sept. 30 staff proposal recommending a permanent intrastate rate cap of 4.5 cents per minute for IPCS voice calls.
NARUC Telecom Committee Chair Tim Schram seeks better coordination and greater cost sharing related to digging amid an influx of government funding for broadband deployment, the Nebraska Republican said in an interview. NARUC circulated draft resolutions Tuesday for the state utility regulator association’s Nov. 10-13 meeting in Anaheim. In addition to a Schram proposal about coordination, the Telecom Committee plans to weigh drafts on optimizing phone number resources and defending the constitutionality of the federal universal service fund (USF) surcharge mechanism.
Florida “cannot begin to show that its draconian access restrictions are necessary to advance any legitimate interest it may assert” to protect children, NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) wrote in a complaint Monday at the U.S. District Court for Northern Florida. The tech industry groups filed a First Amendment challenge against a Florida law set to take effect Jan. 1.
The Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority in an order Wednesday denied a Communications Workers of America petition challenging two pole-attachment orders from 2022. CWA claimed in an April 29 petition that PURA decisions from 2022 on one-touch, make ready and a single visit transfer (SVT) process for double poles, plus a policy working group’s actions, “improperly mandated that Frontier and other Connecticut telecommunications companies ‘use third-party non-union contractors for bargaining unit work, without notice to or negotiation with CWA Local 1298.’” However, CWA’s petition isn’t “the proper vehicle for challenging an administrative decision,” said PURA. “Given that declaratory rulings may not be used to obtain indirectly that which is not available directly, the Authority declines to issue a declaratory ruling as to the validity of the OTMR and SVT Decisions. Even if the decisions could be appealed, added PURA, CWA failed to meet the statutory deadline to challenge them. In addition, CWA failed to show that the policy working group’s actions “constitute unlawful interference by the Authority with CWA’s contract with Frontier,” the authority said. “Contrary to CWA’s assertions, contractors were not forced upon attachers.” PURA Chair Marissa Gillett and Commissioners Jack Betkoski and David Arconti signed the order (case 24-05-11). CWA may have "no choice but to sue PURA," emailed Camilo Duran, a Yale Law School student interning with the Worker and Immigrant Rights Advocacy Clinic. The clinic represents CWA Local 1298. Mandating third-party contractors "interferes with CWA's hard-fought collective bargaining agreement with Frontier, and is a threat to high-paying, stable union jobs in Connecticut," said Duran: Claiming that the requirement "is immune from review is an affront to democratic accountability and essential workers across the state."
District of Columbia emergency officials opposed a D.C. Council bill aimed at increasing transparency at the Office of Unified Communications 911 center. During a livestreamed Judiciary and Public Safety Committee hearing Wednesday, OUC Director Heather McGaffin raised privacy concerns about the bill, noting calls from people in sensitive situations might be made public. However, Dave Statter, a former journalist who regularly blogs about OUC errors, said privacy concerns are overblown and more transparency could help. But he said the bill doesn't go far enough.
The California Public Utilities Commission is mulling ways it can support broadband adoption in the wake of the federal affordable connectivity (ACP) program ending, Communications Division Director Rob Osborn said during the California Broadband Council’s meeting Tuesday. The state is making significant progress advancing its broadband-for-all goals, reported Scott Adams, deputy director of the California Department of Technology (CDT) broadband and digital literacy office.
Some candidates for state utility commissions promised to take on broadband and other telecom matters if they win election this year. Eight states will elect utility regulators this year: Alabama, Arizona, Louisiana, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma and South Dakota. In addition, a New Mexico ballot question will ask voters to authorize millions of dollars for upgrading public safety communications. Meanwhile, Oregon voters will consider a universal basic income that would require Comcast and other big companies to foot the bill.
The California Public Utilities Commission cleared about $41 million in last-mile broadband grants during its livestreamed meeting Thursday. Commissioners voted 5-0 for two draft resolutions comprising the seventh round of awards from the CPUC’s federal funding account. Under one resolution (T-17852), the state will award $18 million to seven projects expected to bring broadband to 2,763 unserved locations in San Luis Obispo County. The awardees were Astound ($6.8 million), Surfnet ($6.4 million) and the city of San Luis Obispo ($4.9 million). Under the second resolution (T-17850), the CPUC will award $23 million total to Comcast ($17 million) and AT&T ($6 million) for projects in Madera and Napa counties, respectively. The CPUC expects the companies to connect 2,843 unserved locations with the funding. CPUC President Alice Reynolds applauded her agency for quickly distributing federal broadband funds. “We're making multi-generational internet infrastructure investments in these communities.” The CPUC delayed votes on proposals regulating VoIP and allowing people without social security numbers to apply for state LifeLine support (see 2410150033). The telecom industry has condemned the VoIP plan and sought more review (see 2410160044 and 2410110040).
Texas expects to soon get NTIA approval of its initial plan for the broadband equity, access and deployment (BEAD) program, but first it must submit another revision of volume 2, said Texas Broadband Development Office (BDO) Director Greg Conte. NTIA approved plans for Alabama and Florida on Thursday, leaving Texas as the lone state or territory without NTIA approval to access its funding. Administrator Alan Davidson said on a Politico podcast Thursday he’s optimistic NTIA will be able to approve Texas’ plan “in the coming weeks.” He also chalked up Republicans’ recent criticisms of BEAD as a symptom of election-year politics.