May: FCC Should Narrow Definition of Public Interest
The FCC should “assume a less interventionist regulatory posture by narrowing the exercise of its public interest authority,” said Free State Foundation President Randolph May in a blog post Thursday. He said a narrower definition of “public interest” should apply…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
in merger reviews and administration of the USF. The FCC “should reform the merger review process by announcing a policy that, absent extraordinary circumstances, it will largely defer to the DOJ’s and FTC’s expertise regarding any competitive concerns.” He called for the agency to “refrain from imposing ‘voluntary' conditions on merger proponents that are unrelated to compliance with existing statutory or regulatory requirements.” Narrower definitions are also needed when the FCC periodically reviews regulations to determine if they are still in the public interest, May said. The FCC “should assert that it possesses the discretion to narrow the scope of its public interest determination in the regulatory review proceedings to effectuate their obvious deregulatory intent." When deciding whether to forebear from enforcing unnecessary rules, the FCC should consider itself to have satisfied the public interest if the rule in question isn’t needed to ensure provider practices are just or protect consumers, May said. “Then, the forbearance provision could be used, as Congress intended, to eliminate many of the legacy regulations which remain on the Commission's books.”