FSF's May: Klobuchar 'Knows Better' Than to Argue Chevron's End Hurts Regulatory Process
Free State Foundation President Randolph May said this week that Senate Commerce Committee member Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., was wrong to argue (see 2412120066) that the U.S. Supreme Court’s July overturning of the Chevron doctrine in Loper Bright v. Raimondo…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
was detrimental because it removed consistency from the regulatory process. Klobuchar made the argument during a Broadband Breakfast event earlier this month. The lawmaker “is right that stability in the law is important for businesses so they can intelligently plan investments and judiciously execute other business decisions,” May said Tuesday in a Washington Times opinion piece. But she “and others who take the same line should know better, especially those … who are familiar with communications law and policy. They have witnessed firsthand how reliance on the Chevron doctrine has promoted instability in the legal regime governing broadband internet providers under the guise of ‘net neutrality.’ The back-and-forth ‘switcheroos’ between the imposition of heavy-handed public utility regulations and a light-touch regulatory regime is a prime example.” Each time there has been a Democratic majority over the past decade, the FCC “has adopted stringent utility regulations for broadband providers,” while “each time the Republicans regained control, the FCC reinstituted a deregulatory regime,” May said: That’s likely to happen again when President-elect Donald Trump returns to office Jan. 20.