Trade-Related Court Cases Filed May 13-26
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the weeks of May 13-19 and May 20-26:
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Danfoss LLC, challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its scroll compressors of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheadings 8414.30.8070 and 8414.30.8070, and secondary subheading 9903.88.03, subject to 25% Section 301 duties, should be excluded from Section 301 duties under HTS subheading 9903.88.14. # 24-00089. Filed May 14.
David's Bridal Inc. (Delaware), challenging lists 3 and 4A Section 301 tariffs on products from China. # 24-00090. Filed May 15.
Marcatus QED, Inc., challenging a Commerce Department final scope ruling that found that the company's whole garlic cloves preserved in brine are within the scope of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic from China. # 24-00091. Filed May 16.
Amoena USA Corp., challenging CBP's denial of its protest claiming its mastectomy bras of Harmonized Tariff Schedule subheading 6212.10.9020, dutiable at 16.9%, should be classified under subheading 9021.10.0090, 9021.39.0000 or 9021.90.8100, free of duty. # 24-00092, -00093, -00094. Filed May 20.
Appeals of CIT Decisions
No appeals of Court of International Trade decisions were filed at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit during the weeks of May 13-19 and May 20-26.