Coil Made of 8011 Aluminum Alloy Not Subject to AD/CVD on Aluminum Sheet From China
Aluminum coil produced from 8011 alloy aluminum, with a thickness between .2mm and 6.3mm, is not subject the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from China, the Commerce Department said in a March 13 scope ruling. It said the relevant orders do not describe products made of 8011 alloy.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
The ruling applies to the products on a countrywide basis, regardless of their producer, exporter or importer, the department said.
The AD/CVD orders cover flat-rolled aluminum made of common alloy with a thickness between .2mm and 6.3mm. The sheet can be clad or not clad. If clad, it can be made of multi-alloy, and if not clad it must be manufactured from 1XXX-, 3XXX- or 5XXX-series alloy.
The 8011 alloy aluminum coil under consideration is not clad, nor is it made of 1XXX-, 3XXX- or 5XXX-series alloy, Commerce said. It noted that the domestic aluminum sheet industry agreed, submitting a comment that the coil “is not covered by the plain language of the” orders.
Comparing 8011 alloy to some of the alloys covered by the orders, Commerce said it found a partial, but not complete, overlap between their chemical compositions. A sheet made of 8011 alloy couldn't also be designated in such a way as to be subject to the orders, it said.
“We find that any aluminum sheet that meets the chemical specifications of 8011 alloy would have a chemical composition incompatible with any of the in-scope registered alloy designations,” it said.
The department also compared the 8011 alloy with “unregistered alloys that contain a major alloying element corresponding” to the alloys mentioned by the orders. Those commonalities, too, were insufficient to consider 8011 alloy in the scope of the orders, it said.