Small Carriers Report Financial Issues Funding Rip and Replace
Rural Wireless Association representatives warned of problems if removing insecure equipment from carrier networks isn’t fully funded by Congress (see 2212150076). “Due to uncertainty about the timing and availability of Reimbursement Program funding, Reimbursement Program participants are finding it difficult…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
even to borrow the funds needed to remove, replace, and destroy their covered equipment,” said a filing posted Monday in docket 18-89. “The difficulty in finding lenders has forced many to halt the removal, replacement, and destruction of equipment, leaving networks to deteriorate as time goes on and service to be lost as Universal Service funds cannot be used to upgrade the networks that contain covered equipment,” RWA said: “Without the ability to obtain funds to replace equipment, providers experience reduction in network coverage in otherwise unserved areas.” RWA met with FCC Wireline Bureau staff. SI Wireless, NTCH Cleartalk, PTCI, Widelity, Strata Networks and Americrew were also at the meeting. RWA also reported on a call with aides to Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel on the 5G Fund. RWA members said they "deployed and are operating mobile networks in areas not served by the nationwide providers, providing needed connectivity to their customers and the public generally though roaming agreements and E-911 services,” said a filing in docket 20-32: “In many cases, this could not have been done without the Universal Service Fund … support the carriers receive through the Mobility Fund, and now those carriers are using their USF support to upgrade to 5G coverage. RWA said the current 5G Fund framework risks undermining this progress, stranding those networks, and wasting current USF support because it lacks a reasonable transition between the legacy support mechanism and a future 5G Fund.”