AT&T Urges USF Contribution Revisions Amid Lifeline Debate
Increasing the Lifeline benefit would require USF contribution changes, AT&T Executive Vice President-Regulatory Joan Marsh blogged Wednesday. Lifeline “needs to be reformed from its current provider-centric structure to one that instead puts the beneficiary at the center of a more…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
digital approach, as modeled after the Department of Agriculture’s successful and evolving [Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program] program,” Marsh said. Congress must "ensure that funds are directly appropriated to support any benefit increase or otherwise ensure that the USF funding mechanism is significantly reformed,” she said. Carriers, state regulators and public industry groups united in opposition to an FCC proposal to raise the Lifeline wireless broadband minimum service standard (see 2009150072). In Sept. 3 letters replying to Rep. Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and other members of Congress, posted Tuesday, Chairman Ajit Pai said the commission “is faced with wildly divergent requests." The "subscribers shouldn’t receive second-class service, so the status quo is unacceptable,” but a dramatic increase “is likely to disrupt the market,” he wrote. Pai proposed a “modest increase to 4.5 GB.”