OneWeb Continues Campaign Against Band Segmentation
OneWeb again argued against band segmentation when coordination talks fail (see 1803010031), in a meeting with FCC International Bureau Chief Tom Sullivan, according to a docket 16-408 filing posted Monday. It said David Goldman, chief counsel-communications and technology, House Commerce…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Committee, and GSMA Spectrum Head Brett Tarnutzer also attended. OneWeb said it also told the bureau that use of the 12.2-12.7 GHz band on a protected basis is vital for the company and terrestrial broadband can't employ that band. OneWeb indicated satellite operators can work with terrestrial interests on flexible and efficient use of the 28 GHz band, but current rules might create earth station siting difficulties. In a separate filing, OneWeb defended as an alternative to band splitting its proposed global public notice rule: that the FCC fall back on filing date priority for deciding how two systems can be protected during stage 2 coordination once the coordination trigger is surpassed and the sides can't reach coordination agreement. It said similar ITU coordination policies guide non-geostationary orbit fixed satellite systems outside the U.S. On concerns that parties with higher ITU coordination priority lack incentive to coordinate with lower-priority systems, it said FCC rules require coordination in good faith, and the current satellite economy shows investors are interested in systems even without ITU priority.