9th Circuit En Banc Panel Sides With FTC Against AT&T in Key Jurisdictional Case
Federal judges upheld a district court denial of an AT&T motion to dismiss an FTC action alleging the carrier's mobility unit data-throttling plan is unfair and deceptive. The ruling appears to preserve FTC authority over the non-common-carrier activities of common carriers such as AT&T Mobility. An en banc panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said an FTC common-carrier exemption is "activity based," covering common-carrier activities only, not "status based," which would also cover non-common-carrier activities of common carriers.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
"The phrase 'common carriers subject to the Acts to regulate commerce' thus provides immunity from FTC regulation only to the extent that a common carrier is engaging in common-carrier services," said the opinion (in Pacer) of the en banc panel in FTC v. AT&T Mobility No. 15-16585. "Reaffirming FTC jurisdiction over activities that fall outside of common-carrier services avoids regulatory gaps and provides consistency and predictability in regulatory enforcement."
AT&T and the FTC didn't comment right away in the minutes after the decision was issued Monday.