FilmOn X Petitions for Rehearing of 9th Circuit Decision
Copyright Office interpretation of Section 111 of the Copyright Act isn't backed by plain text or consistently applied, FilmOn X said in a petition (in Pacer) for rehearing en banc filed Tuesday with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
It said the 9th Circuit's March 21 decision that it isn't a cable system and thus eligible for a compulsory license for broadcast programming (see 1703210023) doesn't offer a workable legal standard for eligibility for a Section 111 license. It said the court's "highly deferential treatment [of Copyright Office viewpoints] invades both Congress' power to enact law and the court's duty to interpret that law." FilmOn pointed to statutory licenses given AT&T's U-Verse and Verizon Fios but not to it as examples of inconsistency in granting of statutory licenses. The ruling "mildly endorses" the CO view that a cable system is inherently localized, but it ignored evidence FilmOn restricts retransmission to local communities and thus should be eligible for such a license, it said. Counsel for the appellants, a collection of broadcasters and programmers, didn't comment Wednesday.