NCTA, Public Knowledge Officials Trade Fire on BDS Process, Regulation

with Incompas -- and that suggested cable could dominate the BDS market if the FCC constrains only ILECs. "This theory is wrong in so many different ways, that it requires some unpacking," said NCTA Vice President Steve Morris in a blog post Wednesday called "Let Some Fresh Air Inside the FCC's Smoke-Filled Tent." He wrote, "It's jaw-droppingly hard to conceive that an advocate who has consistently complained about the 'ILEC monopoly' ... would suggest that the biggest ILEC should join the second biggest ILEC in negotiating a regulatory regime that raises obstacles to emerging competitors. If you are concerned about market power and in favor of competition, why would you ever support regulation that constrains emerging competitors -- particularly competitors investing in fiber networks that are tremendously expensive to build and that everyone agrees are vital to the future of the nation? Does Feld support FCC action to constrain the new small business services just announced by Google Fiber or is it just cable that should be limited?" Despite extensive FCC data collection, "none of that data even hints at" emerging competitors exercising market power, Morris wrote. He said it's absurd to believe that limiting ILEC rates without limiting cable rates "will somehow enable cable to dominate the market," when cable has only a 10 percent market share. Feld's "suggestion that AT&T ‘come into the tent and negotiate’ illustrates just how broken this process has become -- encouraging a ‘wheel and deal’ mentality more apt for the selling of used cars," Morris said. Feld disagreed. "NCTA wants to negotiate a new STB [set-top box] standard for their ‘get rid of the box’ alternative. How is that not also a ‘smoke filled room?’ To paraphrase Captain Renault from Casablanca: NCTA is shocked, SHOCKED to find there are ex parte meetings going on here," he emailed. "Does NCTA really need a lecture on how the ex parte process in a permit but disclose proceeding works? Verizon and Incompas will continue to talk to each other and submit their proposals through the very public process -- just like NCTA will, presumably, someday, possibly, submit some further details on what 'get rid of the box' actually means and how it would work. Then other folks -- like NCTA in the case of BDS, or PK in the case of STBs -- get to meet with the staff and respond. Look, if NCTA wants to propose getting rid of 'permit but disclose proceedings' and do this just on comments and replies with no meetings for anyone, cool. But NCTA should stop playing the offended hypocrite.”