ViaSat Pushes for 'Technologically Neutral' CAF Phase II Subsidy Auction
ViaSat pressed the FCC to devise "technologically neutral" USF reverse auctions that permit all technologies to compete for broadband subsidies on an equal playing field. ViaSat advocates "a straightforward design for the upcoming Connect America Fund Phase II reverse auctions…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
that would award funds to the bidder that can offer qualifying service with the lowest required subsidy, thereby encouraging broad participation and facilitating efficient outcomes," said a company filing in docket 10-90 Thursday. "ViaSat opposes proposals that would unduly complicate the CAF II reverse auctions by awarding 'points' to certain bidders based on subjective criteria -- particularly as those proposals tend to favor particular technologies over others in heavy-handed fashion." It said the March 14 letter from the Utilities Telecom Council and other rural electric and telco associations responding to a Dec. 29 Hughes Network Systems (HNS) submission underscores the problem of points-based plans. "The Associations and HNS both advocate complex schemes that would create opportunities for gaming the funding process and marginalizing particular technologies -- including, in the case of the Associations’ proposal, marginalizing satellite broadband," ViaSat said. It said the proposals would: (1) delay initial funding selections and spark numerous challenges to them, (2) favor certain technologies over others without regard to quality or cost efficiency, (3) inflate funding requirements, leading to increased contribution burdens for consumers and/or a “funding gap” that leaves many unserved households without broadband access, and (4) at best, delay the availability of service to those households. ViaSat disputed association arguments that satellite service is incapable of providing high-quality broadband service.