Plaintiffs in Dish Suit Pointing to Ruling in Bid To Deny Motion To Stay
A federal judge's denial of a motion to stay in a putative class action against an auto parts retailer is being cited to bolster arguments against a motion to stay filed by Dish Network in a related suit. The plaintiffs…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
in Ernst et al. v. Dish and Sterling Infosystems on Tuesday filed a copy of a Dec. 18 ruling by U.S. District Judge Greg Kays of Kansas City, Missouri, in which Kays shot down a motion to stay by O'Reilly Automotive Stores in a Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) suit brought by a woman who charges she was unfairly denied employment there after O'Reilly ran a credit check on her. Dish and background check company Sterling face a similar FCRA-related suit for their use of credit reports to do background checks on prospective employees or subcontractors. Dish and Sterling are seeking a delay in the plaintiffs' motion for class certification, saying the Spokeo v. Robins case now before the Supreme Court -- which also involves alleged FCRA violations -- will affect class certification and court jurisdiction issues (see 1512160017). In Kays' ruling -- submitted as part of the Ernst et al. filing -- the judge said O'Reilly "will not be irreparably harmed if the stay is not granted" while the court waits for a decision in Spokeo. "Granted, Defendants face a risk of incurring what may turn out to be unnecessary expenses if the case is not stayed and the Supreme Court issues a favorable decision, but a risk of a monetary harm is not 'irreparable harm,' " Kays said. "Even if it were, the Court's interest in managing its docket and resolving this case in a timely fashion weighs against granting the motion."