Don't Deal With Interconnection in FCC Net Neutrality Order, ITI Says
The FCC should refrain from imposing net neutrality rules on wholesale interconnection, Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) President Dean Garfield and ITI Senior Vice President-Government Affairs Vince Jesaitis told Philip Verveer, senior counsel to Chairman Tom Wheeler, and aide Daniel…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
Alvarez Jan. 14, said an ex parte filing posted in docket 14-28 Tuesday. Including interconnection in the net neutrality order expected in February is still up in the air (see 1501150054). The commission should not act until it develops “a more robust record” on the need for regulatory intervention, defines the problem that needs to be solved, and finds that regulation would not harm the wholesale broadband market or residential consumers’ Internet experience, ITI said. “At a minimum the technical aspects and business implications of peering and interconnection need to be understood fully before deciding on the best path forward,” said ITI, which said regulatory intervention “based on the limited record” could “do more harm than good.” Members include Akamai, AOL, Dell, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Yahoo, says the ITI website. Meanwhile, in its separate comments in the docket, Verizon called the New Network Institute’s Jan. 13 petition for the commission to investigate the company “frivolous,” in a letter to the agency, posted Tuesday. NNI accused Verizon of “massive deception,” Verizon said, because the telco had relied on Title II in cable franchise applications as the source of its authority to deploy fiber, while opposing a Title II net neutrality approach for broadband. “But there is no ‘gotcha’ here,” Verizon said. Verizon offers plain old telephone service (POTS) over its fiber network, which is subject to Title II. It also offers other services over the same network, like FiOS TV and FiOS Internet, which haven’t been subject to Title II, Verizon said. “Offering POTS over the network -- and relying on our traditional telephone franchise for purposes of deploying networks that are still used to offer traditional telephone services -- is irrelevant to the question of the regulatory classification for broadband Internet access services or what the best regulatory framework is to encourage continued investment in broadband Internet access.”