Congress shouldn’t mandate FM chips on cellphones, said a House...
Congress shouldn’t mandate FM chips on cellphones, said a House resolution introduced late Thursday by Communications Subcommittee Ranking Member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., and Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif. H Con Res 42 also said Congress should protect creators of…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
intellectual property and “provide economic incentives that will encourage American artists, creators, and innovators to take the necessary risks to create and innovate.” Issa said “Congress’s imposition of needless technology mandates on the wireless market would hurt consumers by creating tremendous harm to the innovation and creativity that continues to spring forward from this industry.” Eshoo said consumers “deserve to enjoy the technology that’s most appropriate to them” and government shouldn’t “mandate specific technology that limits the way consumers listen to local news, information, and music.” The NAB “supports the inclusion of radio chips in mobile devices, and we would prefer that this be done on a voluntary basis by the carriers,” an association spokesman said. “For public safety reasons alone in an era of terrorism, AMBER Alerts and weather emergencies, there is a strong argument for including broadcast radio reception capability in all mobile devices."