USF Low-Income Fund Going Under Lens of FCC’s IG
The FCC’s inspector general is investigating the Universal Service Fund low-income program and plans to submit a report to the commission and Congress, acting Inspector General David Hunt said Tuesday. In a letter to various committee chairmen and ranking members in the House and Senate, he said his office has withdrawn the previous IG’s December finding that all payments by the program were incorrect, because it may not provide a “meaningful and accurate” picture.
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
The inspector general’s office is “reviewing whether the low income program disbursement system is in accord with applicable law and meets the goals of eliminating fraud, waste and abuse in the federal universal service program,” Hunt said. Afterward, the office will send its “findings, conclusions and recommendations” to the full commission and Congress, he said.
“Universal service programs play a vital role in connecting Americans across the country to our nation’s communications networks,” FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski said. “It is essential that the Commission guard vigilantly against waste, fraud, and abuse of this critical resource. … The FCC must use an auditing process that is fair, efficient, and applies sound methodologies. The new assessment of auditing results and procedures reflects the independent recommendations of the Inspector General.”
An inspector general’s report in December called audits of the low-income fund inconclusive, because the Universal Service Administrative Co. hadn’t kept documents verifying spending figures (CD Dec 15 p3). The audit concluded that all $810.6 million in payments made 2007-2008 and the $795.8 million in 2006-2007 must be considered erroneous payments.
That decision “was based on an interpretation” of OMB guidance to agencies in carrying out the 2002 Improper Payments Information Act, which tells agencies to count a payment as incorrect if there isn’t enough paperwork to figure out whether it’s proper, Hunt said. After reviewing USAC’s response to the IG report in February, “and considering that OIG did not conduct an audit or other structured examination of the low income program disbursement system to reach that earlier determination, we have decided to withdraw the earlier assessment,” he said. Kent Nilsson, the IG in December, wasn’t identified in the letter.
The letter arrived a week after a report by the Congressional Research Service flagged a “significant increase” in incorrect USF payments (CD July 22 p9). The CRS report found that from fiscal 2007 to 2008, improper USF payments spiked to $1.6 billion from $906 million, and the USF error rate increased to 19.2 percent from 14.7 percent. - - Adam Bender