Competitive telecommunications providers increasingly are serving...
Competitive telecommunications providers increasingly are serving rural towns but they are not going to surrounding areas where providing service costs more, said a study of universal service funding sponsored by four telecommunications companies that operate in rural areas. Competition…
Sign up for a free preview to unlock the rest of this article
Communications Daily is required reading for senior executives at top telecom corporations, law firms, lobbying organizations, associations and government agencies (including the FCC). Join them today!
in small towns boosts the need for Universal Service Fund (USF) support in surrounding areas because it cuts incumbent phone companies’ ability to ease financial burdens by averaging, consultants Balhoff & Rowe said in the report. CenturyTel, Consolidated Communications, Embarq and Windstream filed the study with the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service, now studying ways to improve the universal service program. The four companies serve small and midsized communities nationwide. The study, based on Texas Universal Service Fund operations, concluded that competitors “appear unlikely to offer services” in outlying areas soon, with significant potential effects on the universal service program. “Competitors are making the financially rational choice to avoid serving high-cost areas altogether, but carriers of last resort, like the four sponsors of the study, are compelled to serve the areas outside rural towns -- often at a significant loss,” the companies said in a release. With increased competition in towns taking lines from rural incumbents, “internal cross- subsidy systems” used to average costs “will prove inadequate,” the study said. “Historically, policymakers have relied at least in part on monopoly-based support systems founded on internal company cross-subsidies to maintain affordable rates in uneconomic service areas,” the study said. “Those internal cross-subsidy systems almost certainly will prove inadequate to cope with emerging competitive patterns.” A wireless industry representative, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the study did not provide data on wireless costs or coverage patterns, relying mainly on data about cable and competitive wireline overbuilders.