House Commerce Committee ranking Democrat Dingell (Mich.) urged ...

he expressed concern that “until the Commission acts, AT&T will continue its apparent practice of improperly withholding payments it should be paying into the Universal Service Fund (USF), as well as withholding appropriate payments of intrastate access charges.” In a petition filed more than a year ago, AT&T asked the Commission to rule that its “enhanced” prepaid calling card services were “interstate communications subject to interstate, rather than intrastate, access charges.” It also argued that services were information, rather than telecom services, because calling card users heard recorded ads when placing calls. Dingell called the claims absurd and said he was “troubled by the implications of the relief AT&T seeks.” He said ruling in AT&T’s favor would “upset the present balance which permits lower consumer phone rates,” because the company sought to “avoid its obligation to pay lawful intrastate access charges… on calls in which the calling and called parties are located within the same state.” He also urged the Commission to reject AT&T’s claims that its prepaid calling card services were information services, saying that granting such claims would “only free AT&T of any obligation to contribute to the USF in connection with these services” and create an “enormous loophole for other carriers to avoid supporting universal service.” Consumer Federation of America (CFA) Research Dir. Mark Cooper said in an interview CFA was “concerned” about AT&T trying to avoid paying access charges and USF contributions. “The FCC should make sure that everybody who benefits from the public switched network should make fair contributions to recover costs” of maintaining it, he said.