AT&T Wireless, Cingular Wireless, Sprint PCS and Verizon Wireless...

McCaw had sought FCC approval of plan that would allow him to develop terrestrial spectrum using radio spectrum allocated to MSS operators such as New ICO (CD April 4 p1). New ICO’s March filing raised concerns that “the MSS services as applied for may not be viable,” carriers told FCC Chmn. Powell in June 13 letter, citing commercial wireless industry’s keen interest in such spectrum for 3G. Wireless carriers want FCC to defer acting not just on New ICO’s request, but on all pending 2 GHz MSS applications. Carriers said New ICO had reached collaboration agreements with 2 other MSS applicants and that there was “uncertainty” in business plans of other applicants. If Commission decided MSS spectrum was suitable for terrestrial services, it must be auctioned, carriers said. “Action on these applications should be -- and must be -- deferred until the broad spectrum policy and license processing issues raised by New ICO’s fillings are addressed,” they said. Arguments raised in letter expand on those made by CTIA last month in petition for rulemaking that asked Commission to reallocate “underutilized” MSS spectrum for other uses, including 3G. Four wireless carriers disagreed with New ICO contentions that latter was asking for modification of its original license applications. FCC should respond to CTIA petition before it grants any 2 GHz MSS authorizations, they said. They argued that because New ICO’s request would be “fundamental” change in original application, FCC must seek comment on modifications. “By submitting proposed modifications to its system architecture as an ex parte filing in a rulemaking proceeding, New ICO has essentially disregarded the Commission’s application processing requirements,” wireless carriers wrote. Carriers also contended New ICO’s request would: (1) Undermine FCC’s policies on satellite construction and build- out. “In essence, New ICO now has told the Commission that it will not meet the milestones for construction of the MSS system for which it applied.” (2) Contravene existing allocation for MSS, which doesn’t allow domestic terrestrial use. (3) Go against “long-held practices and policies for satellite services.”