Flurry of back-and-forth ex parte filings is continuing at FCC on...

spectrum for 3G wouldn’t harm incumbents. Verizon had argued segmentation of 2.5 GHz band occupied by Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Service (MMDS) and ITFS licensees would be possible. Verizon argued MMDS operators who lease ITFS spectrum have no long-term ownership rights. “Given the independent and interleaved nature of ITFS and MDS operations, it is simply ludicrous to argue that the Commission could reallocate the same 60 MHz of spectrum in every market with no adverse impact to incumbent licensees,” CTN said. Verizon comments “are simply another attempt to distract the Commission’s attention from Verizon’s true intention: to derail the deployment of a service that will directly compete with Verizon’s own DSL service.” Separately, in ex parte filing this month, Motorola outlined benefits of using 1.7 GHz band occupied by military for advanced wireless services. Company argued Dept. of Defense global training and operational requirements aren’t compatible with global use of 1710-1850 MHz band for commercial mobile services. Instead, filing said use of this band for 3G in U.S. would provide “global spectrum alignment.” Motorola said Commission shouldn’t pair 1710-1755 MHz with 2110-2150 MHz, in part because this would provide 85 MHz of spectrum, which isn’t enough to meet demand through 2010. Motorola said this pairing wouldn’t leave room for future growth using additional spectrum at 1755-1850 MHz. On issue of reimbursement of govt. users who relocate, Motorola acknowledged existing law guarantees reimbursement but it is subject to congressional authorization. Company advocated “streamlined process” that would identify costs before auction with “clear rights for both parties” and use of auction revenue to directly finance relocation. This plan also would allow federal users to modernize systems, Motorola said. Motorola contended DoD doesn’t have to vacate 1.7 GHz band altogether to make room for 3G. This could be averted by developing “system-by-system” solutions for accommodating govt. requirements and crafting solutions that would “consider realistic 3G requirements and DoD requirements,” Motorola said. How to attain global spectrum harmonization for 3G services was among issues that also emerged last week during European Institute roundtable on telecom and e- commerce in Washington. Veena Rawat, deputy director-gen. of spectrum planning and engineering for Industry Canada, said she was heartened that U.S. is considering 1.7 GHz for 3G because this would align with choice Canada has already made. “Before we talk about global harmonization we must harmonize with our neighbors here,” she said. Ruprecht Niepold, head of European Union’s mobile and satellite unit, also stressed importance of 3G harmonization, but said he expects more serious discussion about flexible spectrum allocation when attention turns to phasing out existing 2G services.