In defiant response to AT&T Broadband’s request for waiver of franch...

penalties.” Accusing AT&T of misstating federal policy in its letter requesting waiver, Asst. City Mgr. Michael Stover said city should neither agree to waive franchise fees nor indemnify AT&T against various potential costs. “We expect AT&T Broadband to continue to pay all required franchise fees, including those based on cable modem service revenue,” city said. Referring to AT&T’s contention that it passed through franchise fee on cable-delivered Internet service to subscribers under federal law, he said Telecom Act “only permits cable operators to pass through increases in franchise fees on regulated cable service rates. Federal law does not authorize or otherwise address the ability of cable operators to pass through franchise fees on cable modem and other services.” Although federal law allows cable operators to include line item on subscriber bills indicating amount assessed as franchise fee, Stover said including line item was “entirely different concept” than passing through those costs to subscribers. In City of Dallas v. FCC, 5th U.S. Appeals Court, New Orleans, “made it clear that, even when such a line item is included on subscriber bills, franchise fee are imposed upon cable operators, not on subscribers,” he said. As for concerns raised by AT&T over potential class action lawsuits, he said that since franchise fees were paid by AT&T and not subscribers, there were no fees collected from subscribers that could be refunded. “This imaginary exposure to litigation is not a legitimate basis for not paying the required franchise fees.” However, Stover proposed 2 options to allay AT&T concerns about potential litigation: (1) Refrain from itemizing franchise fees on cable modem service because federal law doesn’t require such action. Doing so won’t reduce amount company can collect from subscribers “because you can essentially set your rates at any level you choose.” (2) Agree, as alternative, to pay 5% telecom franchise fee on cable modem service. That appears to be consistent with 9th U.S. Appeals Court, San Francisco, ruling classifying cable modem service as telecom service, he said.