The Commerce Department said it is amending for the third time the final results of an antidumping duty administrative review on new pneumatic off-the-road tires from China (A-570-912) in order to align a duty rate with the July 19 final judgment in a Court of International Trade case challenging the final results of the review covering the period Sept. 1, 2012, through Aug. 31, 2013. In a Federal Register notice scheduled for publication Aug. 15, Commerce said it is amending the final results with respect to the dumping margin assigned to mandatory respondent Double Coin Holdings Ltd.
Court of International Trade
The United States Court of International Trade is a federal court which has national jurisdiction over civil actions regarding the customs and international trade laws of the United States. The Court was established under Article III of the Constitution by the Customs Courts Act of 1980. The Court consists of nine judges appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate and is located in New York City. The Court has jurisdiction throughout the United States and has exclusive jurisdictional authority to decide civil action pertaining to international trade against the United States or entities representing the United States.
The following lawsuit was filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 31 - Aug. 6:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 24-30:
CBP violated importer Royal Brush Manufacturing's due process rights by failing to provide it access to business confidential information (BCI) in an antidumping and countervailing duty evasion proceeding, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit said in a highly anticipated opinion on July 27.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of July 10-16:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the weeks of June 26 - July 2 and July 3-9:
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the week of June 19-25:
The Commerce Department has issued the final results of two antidumping duty administrative reviews on cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel from India (A-533-873) with respect to Goodluck India Limited. Commerce set an AD rate of 1.59% for subject merchandise from Goodluck entered between Nov. 22, 2017, and May 31, 2019, and an AD rate of 1.39% for subject merchandise from Goodluck entered between June 1, 2019, and May 31, 2020. The rates are unchanged from the preliminary results. The goods will be liquidated at importer-specific assessment rates. The new 1.39% AD cash deposit rate for Goodluck takes effect June 26, the scheduled date of publication for these final results in the Federal Register.
The following lawsuits were filed at the Court of International Trade during the weeks of May 29-June 4, June 5-11 and June 12-18:
The Court of International Trade on June 14 granted importer Maple Leaf Marketing's bid to redesignate the U.S.'s counterclaim as a defense in a customs spat on the classification of boronized steel tubing. Dismissing Maple Leaf's bid to dismiss as moot, Judge Claire Kelly cited the court's Cyber Power Systems (USA) v. U.S. decision to find that nowhere in Congress' scheme on the classification of goods does the legislative body explicitly let the U.S. "assert a counterclaim challenging CBP's classification."