The FCC should use required call completion reports as the basis for enforcement action, the Oregon Public Utility Commission (PUCO) said in a filing (http://bit.ly/NV2Ynx) posted online Wednesday. The Nebraska Public Service Commission in its own filing (http://bit.ly/1q7NmMm), also posted Wednesday, agreed. Both opposed a petition (http://bit.ly/1cvh2jf) by Sprint to reconsider using the completion reports in enforcement actions aimed at improving rural call completion. The PUCO said “call completion reports, by themselves, are not the basis for subsequent enforcement action. The reports contain specific measurements that allow the FCC to observe general call completion activity. If one or more reports contain measurement results that vary significantly from the results of all other reports, the FCC can review the underlying data and open an investigation if warranted. Reviews and investigations are not enforcement actions."
Seattle may be seen as a center for high-technology, but don’t expect Google Fiber to come there anytime soon because of its regulatory environment and penchant for public process, said the city’s former chief technology officer, Bill Schrier. Kansas City, Mo.’s City Council approved a contract with Google the day after the city was disclosed as Google Fiber’s launch city, he wrote in an opinion piece Tuesday (http://bit.ly/1fXQLJg) on the Seattle website Crosscut. Seattle would “need to have endless community meetings and hearings and public floggings of Google Executives” before Google Fiber could come, wrote Schrier. “Every citizen in a tinfoil hat who thinks fiber is just another cereal ingredient would have their three minutes in front of the Council.” Also discouraging Google Fiber is a requirement that companies pay for replacing light poles if necessary to serve the project, and a rule that restricts the size of cabinets on city rights-of-way that house fiber, wrote the ex-CTO. Google said last month it may expand its high-speed broadband product to as many as 34 cities beyond where it is now (CD Feb 20 p14).
Texas Lifeline participants deemed eligible through another household member are being contacted to get their Social Security number and date of birth, said the state’s Public Utility Commission in an FCC ex parte filing (http://bit.ly/1kORc9b). The PUC and its contractor, Solix, discovered the data were not being completed during a review of the state’s Lifeline process, PUC Lifeline Program Administrator Jay Stone told an FCC official Feb. 21. The program will begin asking self-enrolled Lifeline participants to renew their enrollment status every seven months, he said, according to the filing posted Friday in docket 11-42. It said certification forms are now only filled out when self-enrollees are initially approved for Lifeline.
A New York appellate court denied Sprint’s request to throw out state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s $400 million lawsuit against the company for allegedly undercollecting and underpaying state and local sales taxes. Brought under the New York False Claims Act, Schneiderman’s suit would require Sprint to pay three times its approximately $130 million underpayment, said the AG’s office in a news release Thursday (http://bit.ly/1hCjeF2). Sprint had sought a dismissal of the suit, saying the AG hadn’t adequately shown that the carrier knowingly violated the tax law and that the company could not be held liable for conduct before the 2010 passage of the False Claims Act. Thursday’s decision by a five-judge panel in a New York appellate court upheld state Supreme Court Justice Peter Sherwood’s July decision to deny Sprint’s petition.
NTIA hosted the first of two workshops last week to get input from states and territories about the start of FirstNet’s network. Representatives from Eastern states met with FirstNet officials at an Atlanta workshop about state consultation and planning for the network, said an NTIA news release Friday (http://1.usa.gov/1n2EYLA). A second workshop is scheduled for March 11-12 in Phoenix for Western states. The workshops also let states discuss how planning is going, learn from each other about stakeholder outreach and governance structures, and develop regional connections and collaboration, said NTIA.
A Minnesota state senator will propose a measure that would create a $100 million competitive grant fund designed to extend broadband into underserved areas of the state. Sen. Matt Schmit, Democrat/Farm Labor Party, who plans to formally introduce the bill in coming days, said in an interview Thursday that the matching program could generate an additional $200 billion in broadband investments. Executive Director Dan Dorman of the Greater Minnesota Partnership, a coalition of businesses, nonprofits and cities that advocate for economic development policies, said the state had set the ambitious goal of being among the top five states nationally in broadband access by 2015. However, a Jan. 27 Minnesota Broadband Task Force report (http://bit.ly/1fujYwJ) found the state is falling short of meeting the target and faces a wide gulf in broadband access between urban and rural areas. Dorman, whose organization is supporting the fund, noted the state is expected to have a $1 billion budget surplus in the coming two-year budget cycle.
FairPoint Communications met its goal to increase broadband access to 95 percent of its access lines in New Hampshire, said the telco in a Thursday news release. It sai, the company has invested over $700 million since April 2008 in its communications infrastructure and technology to reach new customers, upgrade its network and expand broadband in northern New England (http://tinyurl.com/k7hbwc9. The goal had been to meet the 95 percent threshold by year’s end.
Greensboro and Guilford County, N.C., are working with Motorola Solutions to design a comprehensive management program to help the municipalities’ public safety technology planning. Motorola’s Migration Assurance Program (http://bit.ly/1dzQsjx) is intended to help the communities manage and control spending on the technology, while maintaining performance and interoperability, and adapt to changing technologies, said a company news release Wednesday (http://bit.ly/1dzQsjx).
Any attempt by the FCC to preempt state laws that make it harder for municipalities to create broadband networks (CD Feb 24 p1) “would undermine local government accountability to state governments and to taxpayers” and be illegal, said the Free State Foundation Wednesday (http://bit.ly/1dzYdG4). FSF Scholar Seth Cooper said stripping states’ control over their cities and counties would violate constitutional federalism principles. Nearly 20 states laws limit municipal-backed broadband networks, and “prevent local government conflicts of interest with the private sector marketplace competitors who invest tens of millions of dollars in localities to build out their broadband networks,” wrote Cooper. “They also protect local taxpayers from potentially devastating financial losses from poorly-run municipal broadband projects."
AT&T Michigan and Sprint filed with the Michigan Public Service Commission Tuesday a proposed agreement partially resolving their IP interconnection dispute. It still leaves in question the answer to the central argument between the companies: Sprint’s ability to get IP interconnection with AT&T. Under the agreement, all traffic Sprint exchanges with AT&T will be delivered in TDM format. The sides agreed they may, on or around July 15, amend the agreement to include IP interconnection. Spokesmen for both companies declined comment. The agreement comes after the MPSC ruled (http://bit.ly/1k7xkBc) in Sprint’s favor (CD Dec 10 p12) and ordered AT&T to reach an IP interconnection agreement with the company. The MPSC has 30 days to act on the agreement. It’s scheduled to meet again March 6. The companies faced a deadline Tuesday to submit the agreement.