A coalition of consumer advocacy organizations asked the FCC to require consumer broadband labels be displayed on monthly bills (see 2209090042). Free Press, Consumer Reports, Next Century Cities and Common Cause told an aide to Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel the label is "intended to hold ISPs accountable and help consumers avoid hidden fees that often pop up on their monthly bill," per an ex parte filing Tuesday in docket 22-2. The FCC should also require a non-digital label that's accessible to consumers buying broadband for the first time or who don't speak English, the groups said.
The FCC Wireline Bureau Friday denied requests from six providers to keep confidential certain information submitted as part of the broadband data collection. The bureau denied requests from CVEC Fiber about its data on potential service areas, and Massillon Cable TV for its broadband availability supporting data. It also denied requests from Blossom Telephone, IdeaTek Telecom and Lincoln County Telephone for fixed broadband coverage methodology data. Silver Star's confidentiality request for its fixed broadband coverage methodology and broadband availability supporting data was denied. The bureau granted ERC Broadband's request for confidential treatment of its subscription data.
Sorenson asked the FCC to reconsider certain parts of its June order on video relay services, in a petition posted Friday in docket 03-123 (see 2206300058). It sought reconsideration of the requirement that VRS providers "terminate service to unregistered customers after the two-week grace period" and that a porting-in VRS provider "reverses an unregistered customer’s porting process after the two-week grace period." Removing a phone and routing number "renders the user's service inoperable," Sorenson said, and "just because some users cannot complete verification within two weeks does not mean that they should lose access to essential VRS services entirely." A porting-in provider should also be allowed to continue providing service during re-verification "provided that the porting-in provider does not seek compensation until such time as the consumer is re-verified," Sorenson said.
Industry groups asked the FCC to ensure the affordable connectivity program's annual data collection is "streamlined and efficient for the benefit of consumers and providers," per an ex parte filing posted Thursday in docket 21-450 (see 2207260070). NTCA, USTelecom, CTIA, NCTA and ACA Connects met with Wireline Bureau and Office of Economics and Analytics staffers. The groups said a subscriber-level collection "would run afoul" of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and be "difficult, if not impossible" to define the requirement. It would also "have a chilling effect among subscribers who do not wish to turn over their personal data," the groups said, suggesting the FCC collect aggregated data at the state level on price and subscription rates of ACP service offerings.
The FCC committed nearly $78 million in additional Emergency Connectivity Fund support Wednesday, totaling nearly $6.1 billion to date (see 2210050063). The new funding will support applications from the first and third application filing windows, said a news release. “As the school year progresses, we need to make sure that kids can connect with teachers and homework assignments when classes finish for the day,” said Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel.
The FCC Enforcement Bureau entered into settlement agreements with five providers for failing to file annual 911 reliability certifications for 2021, it said in orders released Friday. The bureau settled with Consolidated Communications, Highland Telephone Cooperative, Mud Lake Telephone, Otelco Telephone, and Viya. Consolidated and Highland each agreed to pay a $3,500 fine. Mud Lake, Otelco and Viya each agreed to pay a $6,000 fine.
Northern Valley Communications and the FCC filed a joint stipulation with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to dismiss the company's appeal of an FCC order requiring Northern Valley to remove its tariff revisions and submit new revisions (see 2006110072). Both sides will cover the costs and fees of the appeal, they said Friday.
The FCC Wireline Bureau released its annual telecom reporting worksheet for 2023 in a public notice Friday in docket 06-122. No major changes were made from the previous Form 499.
AT&T alleged AEP Texas overcharged it "exceptionally high pole attachment rates" for years and "failed to offer rate reductions that comport with commission pole attachment rate orders," in a complaint posted to the FCC Wednesday in docket 22-357. AT&T asked the FCC to intervene by ordering AEP to charge "just and reasonable rates" and to issue a refund for the unlawfully collected amount. It said AEP "has refused to reduce contract rates that far exceed both the new and old telecom rates." The FCC Enforcement Bureau directed AEP to file an answer to the complaint by Nov. 3, and AT&T to file a response by Nov. 14. The bureau directed both companies to submit a joint statement by Dec. 1.
The FCC Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau wants comments by Oct. 26, replies Nov. 7, on InnoCaption's application for full certification to provide IP captioned telephone service, said a public notice Wednesday in docket 03-123 (see 2209130061).