Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., plans to introduce legislation requiring the reallocation of 200 MHz of federally held spectrum for commercial use by wireless carriers, he said at a Washington event hosted by the Jack Kemp Foundation. “The more spectrum and bandwidth we can open up to the private sector, the more jobs we can create,” Rubio said, citing what he sees as a spectrum “highway” getting crowded. “If we do not address it, innovations will go unrealized, consumers will face more dropped calls, overcapacity networks and higher prices.” He will introduce a bill “soon” that he hopes “will be bipartisan, to increase wireless access and affordability,” he said, speaking Monday afternoon at Google’s Washington headquarters. Such legislation could add up to $35 billion to the U.S. gross domestic product and add 140,000 jobs to the country’s economy, a Rubio fact sheet said (http://1.usa.gov/1lshTAU). The legislation would also promote wireless deployment and innovation, the fact sheet said. Rubio emphasized the importance of a free and open Internet and mentioned plans to introduce legislation enshrining the multistakeholder model of governance. When asked about the Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal, Rubio declined comment. “That’s still working itself through the Justice Department process, is that correct?” Rubio said. “I don’t know enough of the details about all the monopoly issues they would be concerned about to opine on it directly.” Rubio emphasized the different ways consumers can receive services from a variety of providers, however, and wondered how that may influence the Justice Department’s decision.

The potential next head of the National Security Agency is open to shifting a key U.S. phone surveillance program, as the administration and some members of Congress have indicated they want to do. “I believe, sir, with the right construct we could make that work,” Vice Admiral Michael Rogers, nominated to be the next NSA director and head of U.S. Cyber Command, told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday at a hearing, speaking of how the government could shift possession of phone metadata collected in bulk to a third party or to service providers. He declined to weigh in on the Patriot Act Section 215 phone surveillance program’s value or effectiveness. He stressed that the program should retain “speed” and the ability to access the intelligence information “in a timely manner.” The administration should give Rogers “more support in explaining these [surveillance] programs” than before, said Sen. Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., top Republican on the Intelligence Committee. Chambliss added he has some “confidence” the administration will. Chambliss also said during the hearing he is “very close” to reaching a deal with Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., to introduce the committee’s cybersecurity bill. Cybersecurity observers have long anticipated the committee’s bill, which they believe would most closely mirror the House-passed Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (HR-624). The “last remaining obstacle” Chambliss and Feinstein are working on deals with one of the Senate bill’s key provisions, which deals with liability protections, Chambliss said during the hearing. A Senate Intelligence bill on cybersecurity would be a “step in the right direction,” Rogers said. But, the “right answer” on cybersecurity probably will need to include improved information sharing between the federal government and critical infrastructure companies, he said.

House Democrats praised a report on the effect of broadband stimulus money on small firms, released by GAO Monday (http://1.usa.gov/1i5JHLi). It “confirms the success of the Recovery Act’s broadband programs,” said House Commerce Committee ranking member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., in a statement. The broadband investments “have not just delivered quicker, cheaper, more reliable service, they have opened new economic opportunity for businesses and people,” said Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. The report “confirms that when it comes to closing our digital divide, federal investment in broadband deployment has been pivotal to the success of America’s small businesses,” said House Communications Subcommittee ranking member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif. “Affordable broadband access allows small businesses to operate more efficiently, retain a talented workforce, and improve services to their customers.” GAO found many benefits from the federal stimulus funding for broadband, though noted higher speeds in urban areas they surveyed compared with rural. “In 9 of the 14 communities where GAO collected information on broadband speeds and prices, federally funded or municipal networks offered higher top speeds than other networks in the same community and networks in nearby communities,” GAO said. “Prices charged by federally funded and municipal networks were slightly lower than the comparison networks’ prices for similar speeds. Prices for lower to mid-range speed tiers available from federally funded and municipal networks in nonurban areas also compared favorably to prices in urban areas in the same state."

The Senate Commerce Committee said Friday it is again postponing an executive session, set for Wednesday, in which it was expected to mark up the Transparency in Assertion of Patents Act (S-2049) and seven other bills. The committee had previously scheduled the markup for March 5 (CD March 3 p19).

A hearing on Section 512 of Title 17 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act by the House Intellectual Property Subcommittee has been rescheduled for Thursday at 2141 Rayburn at 9:30 a.m., according to the committee’s website (http://1.usa.gov/1niubgx).

Two senators strongly urged the U.S. Transportation Department to ban in-flight cellphone conversation on commercial flights, in a letter Thursday to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “Adding the burden of listening to a cacophony of personal conversations while confined to a 17-inch seat strikes us as unnecessary,” said Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., lamenting the “hostile atmosphere” they believe would result (http://1.usa.gov/P9HNiS). “A clear prohibition of phone calls by the [Federal Aviation Administration] will reduce the likelihood that crew will be forced to place themselves in harm’s way to disrupt physical or verbal altercations between passengers.” They introduced legislation together late last year to forbid such in-flight cellphone conversation. “I'm glad the Department of Transportation is thinking about putting the brakes on a bad idea before it takes flight,” Alexander said in a statement. “With two million passengers hurtling through the air each day, the Transportation Security Administration would have to hire three times as many air marshals to deal with fistfights."

Net neutrality legislation in the House has begun slowly picking up supporters, for both partisan bills introduced earlier this year. The Democrats’ Open Internet Preservation Act racked up 31 co-sponsors, most recently Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., on Thursday. HR-3982 proposes to restore the FCC net neutrality rules that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated in January. Meanwhile, the Republicans’ Internet Freedom Act is up to 34 co-sponsors, with five Republicans signing on Thursday. HR-4070 would void the FCC net neutrality order the court vacated and prevent the agency from reinstating any such regulations. Neither bill has any support from the opposite party. Given this split, lobbyists have told us not to expect any net neutrality measure to pass into law (CD Feb 3 p1).

The Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act reauthorization draft earned tentative support from satellite companies and broadcasters after its release late Thursday (CD March 7 p7). House Communications Subcommittee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore., released the draft, rumors about the contents of which had worried broadcasters in the days leading up to its release (CD Feb 28 p1). Dish and DirecTV issued a joint statement calling the draft “an important first step” and pointed to how it “addresses one of the most egregious forms of retransmission consent abuse -- joint negotiating agreements among broadcasters.” NAB is “extremely encouraged” and said it’s a draft bill NAB “is pleased to support,” despite hopes for a clean reauthorization bill, said President Gordon Smith. “NAB appreciates lawmakers’ recognition that the FCC should look at broadcaster sharing agreements in the context of a holistic review of media ownership rules before taking any action on the issue.” The draft unexpectedly included language limiting FCC action on sharing agreements until it completed its quadrennial review -- a move that flew in the race of FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler’s intentions also announced Thursday. Democrats had widely praised Wheeler for his announcement. Subcommittee ranking member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., said she is glad Wheeler shares her view “that our retransmission consent regime is broken and in need of reform” and praised his proposal. House Commerce Committee ranking member Henry Waxman, D-Calif., welcomed the FCC decision and “strongly” backs the “proposal to bring broadcast television’s attribution rules for Joint Services Agreements in line with [those for] broadcast radio,” he said in a statement. “I am also pleased with the Chairman’s plan to examine shared services agreements. While there are many instances where broadcasters sharing resources is appropriate, such sharing arrangements should not be used to circumvent the FCC’s ownership rules and undermine localism, competition and diversity over the public airwaves.” Waxman praised the rules as striking “a good balance.” Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., favorably praised the FCC announcement for recognizing what he sees as “misuse of joint sales agreements and shared services agreements by broadcasters” and will consider further steps the FCC and Congress can take. Democrats have not yet commented on the STELA draft, despite inquiries.

Use the Satellite Television Extension and Localism Act reauthorization process to revamp cable law, wrote Free State Foundation Scholar Seth Cooper in a blog post Thursday (http://bit.ly/1fJXbNr). “STELA reauthorization legislation constitutes one plausible vehicle to clean out outdated basic tier cable regulations,” Cooper said, slamming basic tier and must-buy regulation. “Congress should keep an open mind about using STELA as a route to regulatory reform.” Cooper disputed the pushes from broadcasters and certain members of Congress to keep STELA reauthorization clean: “Prior STELA reauthorization legislation included a variety of provisions touching on video services. For example, the 2010 bill reauthorizing STELA included directives to the Copyright Office regarding filing fees, audits, and reports. It likewise permitted carriage of low-power broadcast TV stations throughout local markets and modified cable statutory licenses to address carriage of multicast broadcast TV streams.” Cooper praised two video bills that Free State has supported: The Next Generation Television Marketplace Act (HR-3720) of Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., and the Consumer Choice in Video Devices Act (HR-3196) of Subcommittee Vice Chairman Bob Latta, R-Ohio, and points to certain of their provisions as ideal for STELA. The latest STELA draft, in fact, has been seen to incorporate the video priorities of both Latta and Scalise. The subcommittee is believed to have removed, as of Wednesday, a provision that would have allowed cable operators to take broadcast stations off the basic tier, due to Republican member and broadcaster opposition (CD March 6 p1). Congress should keep an “open mind,” Cooper recommended.

A House Democrat praised House passage of a bill that includes a provision she backed on data centers, part of the Energy Efficiency Improvement Act of 2014. Data “must be stored and processed at vast data centers which are highly energy inefficient, wasting money and precious energy resources,” said Communications Subcommittee ranking member Anna Eshoo, D-Calif., in a statement Wednesday. She said the legislation “will save the federal government energy and money by requiring the use of energy-efficient and energy-saving technologies, specifically in federal data centers.”