The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 22 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 19 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 18 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
The Commerce Department improperly rejected a first-in-first-out (FIFO) methodology used by an Indonesian mattress exporter to determine which of the exporter’s U.S. inventory to examine in an antidumping duty investigation on mattresses from Indonesia, the exporter said in a brief filed with the Court of International Trade Nov. 9.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 17 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 15-16 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
A coalition of anonymous solar companies is “evaluating all options” following the denial of its requests to apply antidumping and countervailing duties on Chinese solar cells to imports from Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam, it said Nov. 15. The American Solar Manufacturers Against Chinese Circumvention (A-SMACC) said it “strongly” disagrees with the Commerce Department’s rejection of its request for an anti-circumvention inquiry, on the basis that the coalition’s members could not remain anonymous.
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 12 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
The Commerce Department and the International Trade Commission published the following Federal Register notices Nov. 10 on AD/CV duty proceedings:
Mobile home skirting spikes imported by Roy G. Evans Co. are subject to antidumping duties on steel nails from China (A-570-909), the Commerce Department said in a scope ruling issued Nov. 5. Though Roy G. Evans, which does business as EVCO, argued that the spikes are imported under a tariff subheading not listed in the scope of the order, Commerce noted that the Harmonized Tariff Schedule numbers in the scope are not exhaustive, and that the merchandise has the physical characteristics of subject nails.