Efforts on Capitol Hill to pass legislation aimed at combating abusive patent litigation brought by patent assertion entities are being promoted through widespread misinformation, said CEO Nathan Myhrvold of PAE Intellectual Ventures. Patent reform advocates have been pushing for legislation to combat PAEs -- an issue they feel the America Invents Act (AIA) did not adequately address. There are already multiple bills in the House and Senate that address abusive patent litigation, with additional bills in both chambers’ Judiciary committees expected to drop this fall (CD Sept 5 p8).
Jimm Phillips
Jimm Phillips, Associate Editor, covers telecommunications policymaking in Congress for Communications Daily. He joined Warren Communications News in 2012 after stints at the Washington Post and the American Independent News Network. Phillips is a Maryland native who graduated from American University. You can follow him on Twitter: @JLPhillipsDC
Capitol Hill is divided on possible regulations on data privacy -- one camp believes the U.S. needs a new legal regime on data privacy and another believes regulation could injure the current data environment, said Senate Commerce Committee Senior Counsel Christian Fjeld. The pro-regulation camp, including committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., believes any regulations need to include baseline privacy protections based on giving users notice and choice on the collection of their data -- and secure retention of data where necessary, Fjeld said. Rockefeller and Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., introduced the Do-Not-Track Online Act (S-418) in March (CD March 4 p6) to create a “legal obligation” for companies to honor consumers’ Do Not Track requests, Fjeld said. Companies have no legal obligation to honor such requests, and the “balance needs to change” so such requests are honored, he said Tuesday during a Future of Privacy Forum and Stanford Center for Internet and Society event.
Mobile payment services have the potential to become more widespread in a few years, but industry standards may be needed to assuage consumers’ concerns about data security and other issues, said Jamie Barnett, co-chair of Venable’s telecom law practice, at a Law Seminars International event Tuesday. Barnett previously was the FCC’s Public Safety Bureau chief. A recent Federal Reserve study found that 42 percent of surveyed consumers said concerns about data security were the main reason they didn’t use mobile payment services -- the top reason given in the survey, Barnett said. Other barriers to adoption include network security, consumer privacy, liability, dispute resolution and a lack of uniform standards, he said. There’s no single legal framework that deals with mobile payment services, though 19 federal agencies have some regulatory interest in the sector (CD Sept 10 p9).
American Tower said Friday it will buy MIP Tower Holdings, the parent company of Global Tower Partners (GTP); the $4.8 billion purchase price includes $3.3 billion in cash and an agreement to assume $1.5 billion in debt. Macquarie Infrastructure Partners owns a majority of MIP Tower Holdings and GTP; Dutch pension fund manager PGGM has a minority ownership. Although the deal will allow American Tower to expand its position among the top U.S. tower companies, industry analysts told us they don’t believe it will fundamentally affect the U.S. tower market or encounter major regulatory issues. American Tower said it expects the deal to close in Q4 (http://bit.ly/15AKyL2).
It’s unclear whether FirstNet is going to insist on having a strong security interest in the towers included in its nationwide public safety network, said PCIA President Jonathan Adelstein Friday during a BroadbandUS.TV webcast. After the NTIA entity ended negotiations with Broadband Technology Opportunities Program recipients in Charlotte, N.C., and Adams County, Colo., to bring their LTE public safety networks into the FirstNet network (CD Aug 14 p2), some media reports said it was because FirstNet was unwilling to waive its security interest in the projects’ infrastructure.
The forthcoming Cybersecurity Framework being developed by critical infrastructure industries and the National Institute of Standards and Technology “complements, and does not replace, an organization’s existing business or cybersecurity risk management process and cybersecurity program,” said a discussion draft of the framework NIST released Wednesday night. The framework is instead meant to help an organization leverage its existing cybersecurity processes and identify areas to improve risk management, although organizations that lack a cybersecurity program can use the framework as a “reference when establishing one,” NIST said in the draft (http://1.usa.gov/154Zjp9).
The FCC Wireless Bureau’s decision to temporarily halt its unofficial 180-day clock for review of AT&T’s bid to buy former Alltel spectrum licenses from Atlantic Tele-Network was criticized by AT&T, but is consistent with past practices, other industry observers said. The delay was criticized by pro-free market interest groups. The FCC paused its review in order to seek further information from AT&T on its plans to migrate ATN’s prepaid customers onto its network (CD Aug 28 p11).
Outgoing Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano said Tuesday that her successor will need to continue tackling cybersecurity issues, because the U.S. “will, at some point, face a major cyber event that will have a serious effect on our lives, our economy, and the everyday functioning of our society.” Although the Department of Homeland Security has “built systems, protections and a framework to identify attacks and intrusions, share information with the private sector and across government, and develop plans and capabilities to mitigate the damage, more must be done, and quickly,” Napolitano said in a speech at the National Press Club. Napolitano is resigning in late September to become president of the University of California system (CD July 15 p4). President Barack Obama has not yet named his nominee to take over permanently for Napolitano. Experts told us that whoever replaces Napolitano will set the course for the agency’s involvement in cybersecurity issues.
The White House has until early October to decide whether to veto a U.S. International Trade Commission exclusion order that would ban the import of certain Samsung mobile devices because they violated two Apple patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 7,479,949 and 7,912,501 (CD Aug 15 p10). The exclusion order against Samsung is the latest episode in a yearslong series of legal battles at the ITC and federal courts between the top smartphone manufacturers as each seeks to gain market share. Patent attorneys and industry experts told us court-ordered sales bans typically have only a limited effect on the wireless carriers that have deals with the manufacturers to provide mobile devices to their subscribers.
A coalition of advocacy and consumer groups for deaf and blind persons opposed multiple provisions of the FCC’s June order that would institute changes to the Video Relay Service (VRS) program, saying in comments released Tuesday that the order “may cause harm to the quality of VRS” (http://bit.ly/12mKIrd). The VRS order would reduce compensation rates to various-sized providers and created interoperability provisions to give users power to more easily choose providers and equipment (CD June 11 p1). The groups said they believe there has been “no effort on the part of the Commission to compensate or reward providers for improving functional equivalency in VRS calls. The Commission needs to reward such competition-driven innovation even during any efforts to improve the efficiency of the VRS system.”